Does Unification Come at a Cost? Uni-SafeBench: A Safety Benchmark for Unified Multimodal Large Models
arXiv AIArchived Apr 02, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2604.00547v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Unified Multimodal Large Models (UMLMs) integrate understanding and generation capabilities within a single architecture. While this architectural unification, driven by the deep fusion of multimodal features, enhances model performance, it also introduces important yet underexplored safety challenges. Existing safety benchmarks predominantly focus on isolated understanding or generation tasks, failing to evaluate the holistic safety of UMLMs when
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 1 Apr 2026]
Does Unification Come at a Cost? Uni-SafeBench: A Safety Benchmark for Unified Multimodal Large Models
Zixiang Peng, Yongxiu Xu, Qinyi Zhang, Jiexun Shen, Yifan Zhang, Hongbo Xu, Yubin Wang, Gaopeng Gou
Unified Multimodal Large Models (UMLMs) integrate understanding and generation capabilities within a single architecture. While this architectural unification, driven by the deep fusion of multimodal features, enhances model performance, it also introduces important yet underexplored safety challenges. Existing safety benchmarks predominantly focus on isolated understanding or generation tasks, failing to evaluate the holistic safety of UMLMs when handling diverse tasks under a unified framework. To address this, we introduce Uni-SafeBench, a comprehensive benchmark featuring a taxonomy of six major safety categories across seven task types. To ensure rigorous assessment, we develop Uni-Judger, a framework that effectively decouples contextual safety from intrinsic safety. Based on comprehensive evaluations across Uni-SafeBench, we uncover that while the unification process enhances model capabilities, it significantly degrades the inherent safety of the underlying LLM. Furthermore, open-source UMLMs exhibit much lower safety performance than multimodal large models specialized for either generation or understanding tasks. We open-source all resources to systematically expose these risks and foster safer AGI development.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2604.00547 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2604.00547v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.00547
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Qinyi Zhang [view email]
[v1] Wed, 1 Apr 2026 06:45:01 UTC (6,287 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-04
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.LG
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)