The Silicon Mirror: Dynamic Behavioral Gating for Anti-Sycophancy in LLM Agents
arXiv AIArchived Apr 02, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2604.00478v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly prioritize user validation over epistemic accuracy-a phenomenon known as sycophancy. We present The Silicon Mirror, an orchestration framework that dynamically detects user persuasion tactics and adjusts AI behavior to maintain factual integrity. Our architecture introduces three components: (1) a Behavioral Access Control (BAC) system that restricts context layer access based on real-time sycophancy risk s
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 1 Apr 2026]
The Silicon Mirror: Dynamic Behavioral Gating for Anti-Sycophancy in LLM Agents
Harshee Jignesh Shah (Independent Researcher)
Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly prioritize user validation over epistemic accuracy-a phenomenon known as sycophancy. We present The Silicon Mirror, an orchestration framework that dynamically detects user persuasion tactics and adjusts AI behavior to maintain factual integrity. Our architecture introduces three components: (1) a Behavioral Access Control (BAC) system that restricts context layer access based on real-time sycophancy risk scores, (2) a Trait Classifier that identifies persuasion tactics across multi-turn dialogues, and (3) a Generator-Critic loop where an auditor vetoes sycophantic drafts and triggers rewrites with "Necessary Friction." In a live evaluation on 50 TruthfulQA adversarial scenarios using Claude Sonnet 4 with an independent LLM judge, we observe vanilla Claude sycophancy at 12.0% (6/50), static guardrails at 4.0% (2/50), and the Silicon Mirror at 2.0% (1/50)-an 83.3% relative reduction (p = 0.112, Fisher's exact test). A cross-model evaluation on Gemini 2.5 Flash reveals a higher baseline sycophancy rate (46.0%) and a statistically significant 69.6% reduction under the Silicon Mirror (p < 0.001). We characterize the validation-before-correction pattern as a distinct failure mode of RLHF-trained models.
Comments: 8 pages, 8 figures, 4 tables. Code and evaluation data available at this https URL
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
ACM classes: I.2.7; H.5.2
Cite as: arXiv:2604.00478 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2604.00478v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.00478
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Harshee Jignesh Shah [view email]
[v1] Wed, 1 Apr 2026 04:51:28 UTC (78 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-04
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)