CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Apr 01, 2026

GISTBench: Evaluating LLM User Understanding via Evidence-Based Interest Verification

arXiv AI Archived Apr 01, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2603.29112v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We introduce GISTBench, a benchmark for evaluating Large Language Models' (LLMs) ability to understand users from their interaction histories in recommendation systems. Unlike traditional RecSys benchmarks that focus on item prediction accuracy, our benchmark evaluates how well LLMs can extract and verify user interests from engagement data. We propose two novel metric families: Interest Groundedness (IG), decomposed into precision and recall compo

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 31 Mar 2026] GISTBench: Evaluating LLM User Understanding via Evidence-Based Interest Verification Iordanis Fostiropoulos, Muhammad Rafay Azhar, Abdalaziz Sawwan, Boyu Fang, Yuchen Liu, Jiayi Liu, Hanchao Yu, Qi Guo, Jianyu Wang, Fei Liu, Xiangjun Fan We introduce GISTBench, a benchmark for evaluating Large Language Models' (LLMs) ability to understand users from their interaction histories in recommendation systems. Unlike traditional RecSys benchmarks that focus on item prediction accuracy, our benchmark evaluates how well LLMs can extract and verify user interests from engagement data. We propose two novel metric families: Interest Groundedness (IG), decomposed into precision and recall components to separately penalize hallucinated interest categories and reward coverage, and Interest Specificity (IS), which assesses the distinctiveness of verified LLM-predicted user profiles. We release a synthetic dataset constructed on real user interactions on a global short-form video platform. Our dataset contains both implicit and explicit engagement signals and rich textual descriptions. We validate our dataset fidelity against user surveys, and evaluate eight open-weight LLMs spanning 7B to 120B parameters. Our findings reveal performance bottlenecks in current LLMs, particularly their limited ability to accurately count and attribute engagement signals across heterogeneous interaction types. Comments: 9 figures, 20 tables; code at this https URL Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL) ACM classes: H.3.3; I.2.7 Cite as: arXiv:2603.29112 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2603.29112v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.29112 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Iordanis Fostiropoulos [view email] [v1] Tue, 31 Mar 2026 01:01:56 UTC (10,694 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-03 Change to browse by: cs cs.CL References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Apr 01, 2026
    Archived
    Apr 01, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗