CivicShield: A Cross-Domain Defense-in-Depth Framework for Securing Government-Facing AI Chatbots Against Multi-Turn Adversarial Attacks
arXiv SecurityArchived Apr 01, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2603.29062v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM-based chatbots in government services face critical security gaps. Multi-turn adversarial attacks achieve over 90% success against current defenses, and single-layer guardrails are bypassed with similar rates. We present CivicShield, a cross-domain defense-in-depth framework for government-facing AI chatbots. Drawing on network security, formal verification, biological immune systems, aviation safety, and zero-trust cryptography, CivicShield in
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
[Submitted on 30 Mar 2026]
CivicShield: A Cross-Domain Defense-in-Depth Framework for Securing Government-Facing AI Chatbots Against Multi-Turn Adversarial Attacks
KrishnaSaiReddy Patil
LLM-based chatbots in government services face critical security gaps. Multi-turn adversarial attacks achieve over 90% success against current defenses, and single-layer guardrails are bypassed with similar rates. We present CivicShield, a cross-domain defense-in-depth framework for government-facing AI chatbots. Drawing on network security, formal verification, biological immune systems, aviation safety, and zero-trust cryptography, CivicShield introduces seven defense layers: (1) zero-trust foundation with capability-based access control, (2) perimeter input validation, (3) semantic firewall with intent classification, (4) conversation state machine with safety invariants, (5) behavioral anomaly detection, (6) multi-model consensus verification, and (7) graduated human-in-the-loop escalation. We present a formal threat model covering 8 multi-turn attack families, map the framework to NIST SP 800-53 controls across 14 families, and evaluate using ablation analysis. Theoretical analysis shows layered defenses reduce attack probability by 1-2 orders of magnitude versus single-layer approaches. Simulation against 1,436 scenarios including HarmBench (416), JailbreakBench (200), and XSTest (450) achieves 72.9% combined detection [69.5-76.0% CI] with 2.9% effective false positive rate after graduated response, while maintaining 100% detection of multi-turn crescendo and slow-drift attacks. The honest drop on real benchmarks versus author-generated scenarios (71.2% vs 76.7% on HarmBench, 47.0% vs 70.0% on JailbreakBench) validates independent evaluation importance. CivicShield addresses an open gap at the intersection of AI safety, government compliance, and practical deployment.
Comments: 25 pages, 17 tables, 2 figures
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.29062 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2603.29062v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.29062
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: KrishnaSaiReddy Patil [view email]
[v1] Mon, 30 Mar 2026 22:58:04 UTC (49 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CR
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-03
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)