Property on Clifford gates and unitary 2-design: wrong reference in the paper. I am looking for a proof
Quantum Computing SEArchived Mar 31, 2026✓ Full text saved
I am currently reading this paper , and on page 9, Eq (5), they state that: $$ \mathbb{E}_C[(C \otimes C^*) \rho_{AB} (C \otimes C^*)^{\dagger}]=f^n \Phi^{\otimes n}_{AB} + \frac{1-f^n}{4^n-1} (\mathbb{I}^{\otimes n}_{AB}-\Phi^{\otimes n}_{AB}) $$ , where: $C$ is a Clifford gate. $C^*$ is the complex conjugate of this Clifford (conjugate performed in the computational basis to my understanding). $\mathbb{E}_C$ is an average over the Clifford group. $\rho_{AB}$ is a $2n$ qubit density matrix ( $n
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Property on Clifford gates and unitary 2-design: wrong reference in the paper. I am looking for a proof
Ask Question
Asked today
Modified today
Viewed 12 times
2
I am currently reading this paper, and on page 9, Eq (5), they state that:
E
C
[(C⊗
C
∗
)
ρ
AB
(C⊗
C
∗
)
†
]=
f
n
Φ
⊗n
AB
+
1−
f
n
4
n
−1
(
I
⊗n
AB
−
Φ
⊗n
AB
)
𝐸
𝐶
[
(
𝐶
⊗
𝐶
∗
)
𝜌
𝐴
𝐵
(
𝐶
⊗
𝐶
∗
)
†
]
=
𝑓
𝑛
Φ
𝐴
𝐵
⊗
𝑛
+
1
−
𝑓
𝑛
4
𝑛
−
1
(
𝐼
𝐴
𝐵
⊗
𝑛
−
Φ
𝐴
𝐵
⊗
𝑛
)
,
where:
C
𝐶
is a Clifford gate.
C
∗
𝐶
∗
is the complex conjugate of this Clifford (conjugate performed in the computational basis to my understanding).
E
C
𝐸
𝐶
is an average over the Clifford group.
ρ
AB
𝜌
𝐴
𝐵
is a
2n
2
𝑛
qubit density matrix (
n
𝑛
qubits in A,
n
𝑛
qubits in B). Physically it represent the total quantum state of the
n
𝑛
pairs before distillation.
Φ
AB
Φ
𝐴
𝐵
is a 2-qubit "perfect" Bell pair.
f=Tr[
Φ
⊗n
AB
ρ
AB
]
1/n
𝑓
=
𝑇
𝑟
[
Φ
𝐴
𝐵
⊗
𝑛
𝜌
𝐴
𝐵
]
1
/
𝑛
: it is the initial "single-pair" fidelity with respect to
n
𝑛
perfect Bell pairs.
They claim that this derivation is done in the reference [ 83 , Theorem 7.25], but I opened the reference and I cannot find the theorem. I suspect they made a mistake in the reference.
Where can I find such a proof?
Note: it could possibly be a very natural implication from the definition of unitary 2-designs, but I just learnt the concept so I'm not very familiar with it. It could also be "non trivial" to be shown. In any case I'm looking for a reference showing this which could replace the one they cite.
clifford-groupt-designs
Share
Improve this question
Follow
asked 2 hours ago
Marco Fellous-Asiani
2,6002
2 gold badges
19
19 silver badges
50
50 bronze badges
To be honest, the discussion after example 7.25 in the linked reference can be considered the proof, but I think such proof is not appropriate if you're not familiar with these topics. There are many ways to prove that result, for instance, using the representation theory of the Clifford group (Schur's lemma). For another point of view, check out Werner's state en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Werner_state –
David
Commented
1 hour ago
Add a comment
Know someone who can answer? Share a link to this question via email, Twitter, or Facebook.
Your Answer
Sign up or log in
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Name
Email
Required, but never shown
Post Your Answer
By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.
Start asking to get answers
Find the answer to your question by asking.
Ask question
Explore related questions
clifford-groupt-designs
See similar questions with these tags.
The Overflow Blog
Prevent agentic identity theft
Related
6
Proof for Cardinality of the Clifford Group
11
Review paper on depth, qubits and
T
𝑇
gates number on Clifford+T decomposition for various "typical" algorithms
11
Clifford gates are transversal What exactly does this transversal mean? What is the difference between non-Clifford gates and Clifford gates?
5
The construction of every element of the Clifford group using H,S and CNOT circuits
24
Is there a closure property for the entire Clifford hierarchy?
4
Can every unitary be approximated by gates from the Clifford Hierarchy?
7
Why is the orbit of a unitary t design a complex projective t design?
3
Under what conditions are two sets of Pauli operators Clifford-equivalent?
4
Why does the definition of a unitary t-design use tensor products?
1
How to prove that identical Pauli commutation relations guarantee the existence of a conjugating unitary?
Hot Network Questions
How does one decompose hydrogen peroxide in a nitric acid solution so that it can be disposed of with out generating oxygen gas later?
Life on a planet in a binary star system that is orbiting a black hole, how would it work?
Highest die in a standard dice pool after eliminating dice vs a rerolling, exploding, dice pool
Get index of aperiodic number
Why do the taxicab numbers seemingly have a bias towards being even?
Handling Profanity Censorship in BERTopic
Can I abbreviate journal names to first-letter acronyms in references?
What is the Significance of Jesus mentioning Three Different books?
How to stop member function returning T& being defined for T = void (and is supposed to be)
Why does gauge symmetries cause differential operator in action to be singular?
Is it easy to change field of research when moving from PhD to postdoc?
more hot questions
Question feed
By continuing to use this website, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy. By exiting this window, default cookies will be accepted. To reject cookies, select an option from below.
Customize settings
Cookie Consent Preference Center
When you visit any of our websites, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences, or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and manage your preferences. Please note, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.
Cookie Policy
Accept all cookies
Manage Consent Preferences
Strictly Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.
Targeting Cookies
Targeting Cookies
These cookies are used to make advertising messages more relevant to you and may be set through our site by us or by our advertising partners. They may be used to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant advertising on our site or on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device.
Performance Cookies
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.
Functional Cookies
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then some or all of these services may not function properly.
Cookie List
Clear
checkbox label label
Apply Cancel
Consent Leg.Interest
checkbox label label
checkbox label label
checkbox label label
Necessary cookies only Confirm My Choices