Benchmarking Quantum Computers via Protocols -- Comparing Superconducting and Ion-Trap Quantum Technology
arXiv QuantumArchived Mar 31, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2603.27397v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Superconducting and Ion-Trap quantum architectures are common in the current landscape of the quantum computing field, each with distinct characteristics and operational constraints. Understanding and measuring the underlying quantumness of these devices is essential for assessing their readiness for practical applications and guiding future progress and research. Building on earlier work (Meirom, Mor, Weinstein Arxiv 2505.12441), we utilize a benc
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Quantum Physics
[Submitted on 28 Mar 2026]
Benchmarking Quantum Computers via Protocols -- Comparing Superconducting and Ion-Trap Quantum Technology
Nitay Mayo, Tal Mor, Yossi Weinstein
Superconducting and Ion-Trap quantum architectures are common in the current landscape of the quantum computing field, each with distinct characteristics and operational constraints. Understanding and measuring the underlying quantumness of these devices is essential for assessing their readiness for practical applications and guiding future progress and research. Building on earlier work (Meirom, Mor, Weinstein Arxiv 2505.12441), we utilize a benchmarking strategy applicable for comparing these two architectures by measuring "quantumness" directly on optimal sub-chips. Distinct from existing metrics, our approach employs rigorous binary fidelity thresholds derived from the classical limits of state transfer. This enable us to definitively establish quantum advantage of a designated sub-region. We apply this quality assurance methodology to industry leading platforms from both technologies. This comparison provides a protocol-based evaluation of quantumness advantage, revealing not only the strengths and weaknesses of each tested chip and its sub-chips but also offering a common language for their assessment. By abstracting away technical differences in the final result, we demonstrate a benchmarking strategy that bridges the gap between disparate quantum-circuit technologies, enabling fair performance comparisons and establishing a critical foundation for evaluating future claims of quantum advantage.
Comments: 33 pages, 31 figures
Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.27397 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2603.27397v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.27397
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Nitay Mayo [view email]
[v1] Sat, 28 Mar 2026 20:29:23 UTC (7,296 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
quant-ph
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-03
References & Citations
INSPIRE HEP
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)