CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Mar 31, 2026

Dual-Stage LLM Framework for Scenario-Centric Semantic Interpretation in Driving Assistance

arXiv AI Archived Mar 31, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2603.27536v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) increasingly rely on learning-based perception, yet safety-relevant failures often arise without component malfunction, driven instead by partial observability and semantic ambiguity in how risk is interpreted and communicated. This paper presents a scenario-centric framework for reproducible auditing of LLM-based risk reasoning in urban driving contexts. Deterministic, temporally bounded scenario windows a

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 29 Mar 2026] Dual-Stage LLM Framework for Scenario-Centric Semantic Interpretation in Driving Assistance Jean Douglas Carvalho, Hugo Taciro Kenji, Ahmad Mohammad Saber, Glaucia Melo, Max Mauro Dias Santos, Deepa Kundur Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) increasingly rely on learning-based perception, yet safety-relevant failures often arise without component malfunction, driven instead by partial observability and semantic ambiguity in how risk is interpreted and communicated. This paper presents a scenario-centric framework for reproducible auditing of LLM-based risk reasoning in urban driving contexts. Deterministic, temporally bounded scenario windows are constructed from multimodal driving data and evaluated under fixed prompt constraints and a closed numeric risk schema, ensuring structured and comparable outputs across models. Experiments on a curated near-people scenario set compare two text-only models and one multimodal model under identical inputs and prompts. Results reveal systematic inter-model divergence in severity assignment, high-risk escalation, evidence use, and causal attribution. Disagreement extends to the interpretation of vulnerable road user presence, indicating that variability often reflects intrinsic semantic indeterminacy rather than isolated model failure. These findings highlight the importance of scenario-centric auditing and explicit ambiguity management when integrating LLM-based reasoning into safety-aligned driver assistance systems. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2603.27536 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2603.27536v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.27536 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Jean Carvalho [view email] [v1] Sun, 29 Mar 2026 06:20:08 UTC (4,637 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-03 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Mar 31, 2026
    Archived
    Mar 31, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗