CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Mar 31, 2026

MediHive: A Decentralized Agent Collective for Medical Reasoning

arXiv AI Archived Mar 31, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2603.27150v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized medical reasoning tasks, yet single-agent systems often falter on complex, interdisciplinary problems requiring robust handling of uncertainty and conflicting evidence. Multi-agent systems (MAS) leveraging LLMs enable collaborative intelligence, but prevailing centralized architectures suffer from scalability bottlenecks, single points of failure, and role confusion in resource-constrained environmen

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 28 Mar 2026] MediHive: A Decentralized Agent Collective for Medical Reasoning Xiaoyang Wang, Christopher C. Yang Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized medical reasoning tasks, yet single-agent systems often falter on complex, interdisciplinary problems requiring robust handling of uncertainty and conflicting evidence. Multi-agent systems (MAS) leveraging LLMs enable collaborative intelligence, but prevailing centralized architectures suffer from scalability bottlenecks, single points of failure, and role confusion in resource-constrained environments. Decentralized MAS (D-MAS) promise enhanced autonomy and resilience via peer-to-peer interactions, but their application to high-stakes healthcare domains remains underexplored. We introduce MediHive, a novel decentralized multi-agent framework for medical question answering that integrates a shared memory pool with iterative fusion mechanisms. MediHive deploys LLM-based agents that autonomously self-assign specialized roles, conduct initial analyses, detect divergences through conditional evidence-based debates, and locally fuse peer insights over multiple rounds to achieve consensus. Empirically, MediHive outperforms single-LLM and centralized baselines on MedQA and PubMedQA datasets, attaining accuracies of 84.3% and 78.4%, respectively. Our work advances scalable, fault-tolerant D-MAS for medical AI, addressing key limitations of centralized designs while demonstrating superior performance in reasoning-intensive tasks. Comments: Accepted to the 14th IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (IEEE ICHI 2026) Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA) Cite as: arXiv:2603.27150 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2603.27150v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.27150 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Xiaoyang Wang [view email] [v1] Sat, 28 Mar 2026 05:57:58 UTC (1,370 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-03 Change to browse by: cs cs.MA References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Mar 31, 2026
    Archived
    Mar 31, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗