The Price of Meaning: Why Every Semantic Memory System Forgets
arXiv AIArchived Mar 31, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2603.27116v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Every major AI memory system in production today organises information by meaning. That organisation enables generalisation, analogy, and conceptual retrieval -- but it comes at a price. We prove that the same geometric structure enabling semantic generalisation makes interference, forgetting, and false recall inescapable. We formalise this tradeoff for \textit{semantically continuous kernel-threshold memories}: systems whose retrieval score is a m
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 28 Mar 2026]
The Price of Meaning: Why Every Semantic Memory System Forgets
Sambartha Ray Barman, Andrey Starenky, Sofia Bodnar, Nikhil Narasimhan, Ashwin Gopinath
Every major AI memory system in production today organises information by meaning. That organisation enables generalisation, analogy, and conceptual retrieval -- but it comes at a price. We prove that the same geometric structure enabling semantic generalisation makes interference, forgetting, and false recall inescapable. We formalise this tradeoff for \textit{semantically continuous kernel-threshold memories}: systems whose retrieval score is a monotone function of an inner product in a semantic feature space with finite local intrinsic dimension.
Within this class we derive four results: (1) semantically useful representations have finite effective rank; (2) finite local dimension implies positive competitor mass in retrieval neighbourhoods; (3) under growing memory, retention decays to zero, yielding power-law forgetting curves under power-law arrival statistics; (4) for associative lures satisfying a \delta-convexity condition, false recall cannot be eliminated by threshold tuning.
We test these predictions across five architectures: vector retrieval, graph memory, attention-based context, BM25 filesystem retrieval, and parametric memory. Pure semantic systems express the vulnerability directly as forgetting and false recall. Reasoning-augmented systems partially override these symptoms but convert graceful degradation into catastrophic failure. Systems that escape interference entirely do so by sacrificing semantic generalisation.
The price of meaning is interference, and no architecture we tested avoids paying it.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Information Retrieval (cs.IR); Neural and Evolutionary Computing (cs.NE)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.27116 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2603.27116v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.27116
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Ashwin Gopinath [view email]
[v1] Sat, 28 Mar 2026 04:01:59 UTC (521 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-03
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.IR
cs.NE
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)