CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Mar 31, 2026

Neuro-Symbolic Learning for Predictive Process Monitoring via Two-Stage Logic Tensor Networks with Rule Pruning

arXiv AI Archived Mar 31, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2603.26944v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Predictive modeling on sequential event data is critical for fraud detection and healthcare monitoring. Existing data-driven approaches learn correlations from historical data but fail to incorporate domain-specific sequential constraints and logical rules governing event relationships, limiting accuracy and regulatory compliance. For example, healthcare procedures must follow specific sequences, and financial transactions must adhere to compliance

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 27 Mar 2026] Neuro-Symbolic Learning for Predictive Process Monitoring via Two-Stage Logic Tensor Networks with Rule Pruning Fabrizio De Santis, Gyunam Park, Francesco Zanichelli Predictive modeling on sequential event data is critical for fraud detection and healthcare monitoring. Existing data-driven approaches learn correlations from historical data but fail to incorporate domain-specific sequential constraints and logical rules governing event relationships, limiting accuracy and regulatory compliance. For example, healthcare procedures must follow specific sequences, and financial transactions must adhere to compliance rules. We present a neuro-symbolic approach integrating domain knowledge as differentiable logical constraints using Logic Networks (LTNs). We formalize control-flow, temporal, and payload knowledge using Linear Temporal Logic and first-order logic. Our key contribution is a two-stage optimization strategy addressing LTNs' tendency to satisfy logical formulas at the expense of predictive accuracy. The approach uses weighted axiom loss during pretraining to prioritize data learning, followed by rule pruning that retains only consistent, contributive axioms based on satisfaction dynamics. Evaluation on four real-world event logs shows that domain knowledge injection significantly improves predictive performance, with the two-stage optimization proving essential knowledge (without it, knowledge can severely degrade performance). The approach excels particularly in compliance-constrained scenarios with limited compliant training examples, achieving superior performance compared to purely data-driven baselines while ensuring adherence to domain constraints. Comments: Accepted PAKDD 2026 Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2603.26944 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2603.26944v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.26944 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Fabrizio De Santis [view email] [v1] Fri, 27 Mar 2026 19:32:49 UTC (141 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-03 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Mar 31, 2026
    Archived
    Mar 31, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗