Catalytic Coherence Amplification for Quantum State Recovery: Theory, Numerical Validation, and Comparison with Conventional Error Correction
arXiv QuantumArchived Mar 30, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2603.25774v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We present Catalytic Quantum Error Correction (CQEC), a quantum state recovery protocol based on the arbitrary amplification of coherence in catalytic covariant transformations. Unlike conventional quantum error correction, CQEC requires knowledge of the target state and multiple noisy copies, but operates without an error threshold: recovery succeeds whenever the coherent modes of the target state are contained within those of the noisy state (mod
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Quantum Physics
[Submitted on 26 Mar 2026]
Catalytic Coherence Amplification for Quantum State Recovery: Theory, Numerical Validation, and Comparison with Conventional Error Correction
Hikaru Wakaura
We present Catalytic Quantum Error Correction (CQEC), a quantum state recovery protocol based on the arbitrary amplification of coherence in catalytic covariant transformations. Unlike conventional quantum error correction, CQEC requires knowledge of the target state and multiple noisy copies, but operates without an error threshold: recovery succeeds whenever the coherent modes of the target state are contained within those of the noisy state (mode inclusion), regardless of the noise magnitude. A reusable catalyst state mediates the transformation and its reduced state is preserved exactly after each cycle (correlated catalysis). We validate CQEC numerically across four quantum algorithms -- qDRIFT, quantum Kolmogorov--Arnold networks, control-free phase estimation, and Regev factoring -- and a tree tensor network cryptographic protocol, under dephasing, depolarizing, and combined noise. In the asymptotic (infinite-copy) limit, CQEC recovers the known algorithmic output state from fidelity F = 0.07 to F > 0.999 across 200 configurations; at finite copy number n, the fidelity gap scales as 1 - F \leq O(1/\sqrt{n}). We compare with Steane and surface codes under their respectively different operational assumptions. Our results establish coherence resource theory as a complementary foundation for quantum state recovery.
Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.25774 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2603.25774v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.25774
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Hikaru Wakaura [view email]
[v1] Thu, 26 Mar 2026 12:03:20 UTC (187 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
quant-ph
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-03
References & Citations
INSPIRE HEP
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)