CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Mar 30, 2026

ReCUBE: Evaluating Repository-Level Context Utilization in Code Generation

arXiv AI Archived Mar 30, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2603.25770v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently emerged as capable coding assistants that operate over large codebases through either agentic exploration or full-context generation. Existing benchmarks capture a broad range of coding capabilities, such as resolving GitHub issues, but none of them directly isolate and measure how effectively LLMs leverage repository-level context during code generation. To address this, we introduce ReCUBE, a benchmark

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Software Engineering [Submitted on 26 Mar 2026] ReCUBE: Evaluating Repository-Level Context Utilization in Code Generation Jiseung Hong, Benjamin G. Ascoli, Jinho D. Choi Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently emerged as capable coding assistants that operate over large codebases through either agentic exploration or full-context generation. Existing benchmarks capture a broad range of coding capabilities, such as resolving GitHub issues, but none of them directly isolate and measure how effectively LLMs leverage repository-level context during code generation. To address this, we introduce ReCUBE, a benchmark in which LLMs reconstruct a masked file within a real-world repository, using all remaining source files, dependency specifications, and documentation as their only source of context. ReCUBE evaluates reconstructed code with usage-aware test cases that simulate both internal module logic and external cross-file integration, reflecting real-world software usage patterns. We further propose the Caller-Centric Exploration (CCE) toolkit, a set of dependency graph-based tools that can be integrated into agentic frameworks to guide agents toward the most relevant caller files during repository exploration. Experiments across eight models in four settings show that repository-level context utilization remains highly challenging even for state-of-the-art models, with GPT-5 achieving only 37.57% strict pass rate in the full-context setting. Agents augmented with our CCE toolkit consistently outperform all baselines across all evaluated models, with improvements of up to 7.56% in strict pass rate. We release our benchmark, code, and evaluation framework as open source for the NLP research community. Comments: Under Review Subjects: Software Engineering (cs.SE); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2603.25770 [cs.SE]   (or arXiv:2603.25770v1 [cs.SE] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.25770 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Jiseung Hong [view email] [v1] Thu, 26 Mar 2026 08:04:15 UTC (1,201 KB) Access Paper: view license Current browse context: cs.SE < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-03 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Mar 30, 2026
    Archived
    Mar 30, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗