CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Mar 30, 2026

Bitcoin Smart Accounts: Trust-Minimized Native Bitcoin DeFi Infrastructure

arXiv Security Archived Mar 30, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2603.26293v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Bitcoin's limited programmability and transaction throughput have historically prevented native Bitcoin from participating in decentralized finance (DeFi) applications. Existing solutions depend on honest-majority thresholds, or centralized custodial entities that introduce significant trust requirements. This paper introduces Bitcoin Smart Accounts (BSA), a novel protocol that enables native Bitcoin to access DeFi through trust-minimized infrastru

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Cryptography and Security [Submitted on 27 Mar 2026] Bitcoin Smart Accounts: Trust-Minimized Native Bitcoin DeFi Infrastructure Cian Lalor, Matthew Marshall, Antonio Russo Bitcoin's limited programmability and transaction throughput have historically prevented native Bitcoin from participating in decentralized finance (DeFi) applications. Existing solutions depend on honest-majority thresholds, or centralized custodial entities that introduce significant trust requirements. This paper introduces Bitcoin Smart Accounts (BSA), a novel protocol that enables native Bitcoin to access DeFi through trust-minimized infrastructure while maintaining self-custody of funds. BSA achieves this through a combination of emulated Bitcoin covenants using Partially Signed Bitcoin Transactions (PSBTs) and Taproot scripts, a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE)-based arbitration system, and destination chain smart contracts that enable DeFi platforms to accept self-custodial Bitcoin as collateral without necessitating protocol-level modifications. The setup leverages liquidity secured by the Lombard Security Consortium which provides a twofold advantage: for a DeFi protocol, liquidators rely on fungible assets with deep liquidity to quickly exit positions, while for a depositor, the general trust assumptions of honest majority (m-of-n) are reduced to existential honesty (1-of-k). We present the complete protocol design, including the Bitcoin architecture, the TEE-based arbitration mechanism, and the Smart Account Registry for protocol management. We provide a security analysis that demonstrates the correctness, safety, and availability properties under our trust model. Our design enables native Bitcoin to serve as collateral in lending markets and other DeFi protocols without requiring users to relinquish custody of funds. Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR) Cite as: arXiv:2603.26293 [cs.CR]   (or arXiv:2603.26293v1 [cs.CR] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.26293 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Antonio Russo [view email] [v1] Fri, 27 Mar 2026 11:03:21 UTC (34 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.CR < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-03 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv Security
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Mar 30, 2026
    Archived
    Mar 30, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗