arXiv QuantumArchived Mar 27, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2603.24717v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We generalize the polynomial-time outcome-complete simulation algorithm for stabilizer circuits in arXiv:2309.08676 to track global phases exactly, yielding what we call phased outcome-complete simulation. The original algorithm enabled equivalence checking of stabilizer circuits with intermediate measurements and conditional Pauli corrections for all input states and all measurement outcomes simultaneously, but it tracked quantum states only up to
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Quantum Physics
[Submitted on 25 Mar 2026]
Phased outcome-complete simulation
Vadym Kliuchnikov, Adam Paetznick, Marcus P. da Silva
We generalize the polynomial-time outcome-complete simulation algorithm for stabilizer circuits in arXiv:2309.08676 to track global phases exactly, yielding what we call phased outcome-complete simulation. The original algorithm enabled equivalence checking of stabilizer circuits with intermediate measurements and conditional Pauli corrections for all input states and all measurement outcomes simultaneously, but it tracked quantum states only up to a global phase. Our generalization removes this limitation and enables equivalence checking for an important family of non-stabilizer circuits: stabilizer circuits augmented with single-qubit rotations \exp(i\alpha Z) by symbolic angles. Two such circuits are equivalent if they implement the same quantum channel for all values of the symbolic angles and all measurement outcomes, given a one-to-one correspondence between rotation angles in the two circuits and a mapping between measurement outcomes. This model enables testing of compilation algorithms that transform the Clifford portions of a computation while preserving rotation angles. Examples include Pauli-based computation, edge-disjoint path compilation for surface codes, and custom compilation strategies for reversible circuits such as adders, multipliers, and table lookups. Our efficient classical verification methods extend naturally to circuits with outcome-parity-conditional Pauli gates and intermediate measurements, features that are ubiquitous in fault-tolerant quantum computing but are rarely addressed by existing equivalence-checking approaches.
Comments: 13 pages, no figures
Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.24717 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2603.24717v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.24717
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Marcus Silva [view email]
[v1] Wed, 25 Mar 2026 18:41:35 UTC (28 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
quant-ph
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-03
References & Citations
INSPIRE HEP
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)