Trusted-Execution Environment (TEE) for Solving the Replication Crisis in Academia
arXiv SecurityArchived Mar 27, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2603.24878v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The growing replication crisis across disciplines such as economics, finance, and other social sciences as well as computer science undermines the credibility of academic research. Current institutional solutions -- such as artifact evaluations and replication packages -- suffer from critical limitations, including shortages of qualified data editors, difficulties in handling proprietary datasets, inefficient processes, and reliance on voluntary la
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
[Submitted on 25 Mar 2026]
Trusted-Execution Environment (TEE) for Solving the Replication Crisis in Academia
Jiasun Li, Project Team
The growing replication crisis across disciplines such as economics, finance, and other social sciences as well as computer science undermines the credibility of academic research. Current institutional solutions -- such as artifact evaluations and replication packages -- suffer from critical limitations, including shortages of qualified data editors, difficulties in handling proprietary datasets, inefficient processes, and reliance on voluntary labor. This paper proposes a novel framework leveraging new technological advances in trusted-execution environments (TEEs) -- exemplified by Intel Trust Domain Extensions (TDX) -- to address the replication crisis in a cost-effective and scalable manner. Under our approach, authors execute replication packages within a cloud-based TEE and submit cryptographic proofs of correct execution, for which journals or conferences can efficiently verify without re-running the code. This reallocates the operational burden to authors while preserving data confidentiality and eliminating reliance on scarce editorial resources. As a proof of concept, we validate the feasibility of this system through field experiments, reporting a pilot study replicating published papers on TDX-backed cloud VMs, finding average costs of $1.35--$1.80 per package with minimal computational overhead relative to standard VMs and high success rates even for novice users with no prior TEE experience. We also provide a conduct formal analysis showing that TEE adoption is incentive-compatible for authors, cost-dominant for journals, and constitutes an equilibrium in the certification market. The findings highlight the potential of TEE technology to provide a sustainable, privacy-preserving, and efficient mechanism to address the replication crisis in academia.
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.24878 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2603.24878v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.24878
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Jiasun Li [view email]
[v1] Wed, 25 Mar 2026 23:47:59 UTC (179 KB)
Access Paper:
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CR
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-03
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)