CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Mar 26, 2026

Leveraging Computerized Adaptive Testing for Cost-effective Evaluation of Large Language Models in Medical Benchmarking

arXiv AI Archived Mar 26, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2603.23506v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The rapid proliferation of large language models (LLMs) in healthcare creates an urgent need for scalable and psychometrically sound evaluation methods. Conventional static benchmarks are costly to administer repeatedly, vulnerable to data contamination, and lack calibrated measurement properties for fine-grained performance tracking. We propose and validate a computerized adaptive testing (CAT) framework grounded in item response theory (IRT) fo

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Computation and Language [Submitted on 28 Feb 2026] Leveraging Computerized Adaptive Testing for Cost-effective Evaluation of Large Language Models in Medical Benchmarking Tianpeng Zheng, Zhehan Jiang, Jiayi Liu, Shicong Feng The rapid proliferation of large language models (LLMs) in healthcare creates an urgent need for scalable and psychometrically sound evaluation methods. Conventional static benchmarks are costly to administer repeatedly, vulnerable to data contamination, and lack calibrated measurement properties for fine-grained performance tracking. We propose and validate a computerized adaptive testing (CAT) framework grounded in item response theory (IRT) for efficient assessment of standardized medical knowledge in LLMs. The study comprises a two-phase design: a Monte Carlo simulation to identify optimal CAT configurations and an empirical evaluation of 38 LLMs using a human-calibrated medical item bank. Each model completed both the full item bank and an adaptive test that dynamically selected items based on real-time ability estimates and terminated upon reaching a predefined reliability threshold (standard error <= 0.3). Results show that CAT-derived proficiency estimates achieved a near-perfect correlation with full-bank estimates (r = 0.988) while using only 1.3 percent of the items. Evaluation time was reduced from several hours to minutes per model, with substantial reductions in token usage and computational cost, while preserving inter-model performance rankings. This work establishes a psychometric framework for rapid, low-cost benchmarking of foundational medical knowledge in LLMs. The proposed adaptive methodology is intended as a standardized pre-screening and continuous monitoring tool and is not a substitute for real-world clinical validation or safety-oriented prospective studies. Comments: 37 pages, 6 figures Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2603.23506 [cs.CL]   (or arXiv:2603.23506v1 [cs.CL] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.23506 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Tianpeng Zheng [view email] [v1] Sat, 28 Feb 2026 10:45:08 UTC (2,926 KB) Access Paper: view license Current browse context: cs.CL < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-03 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Mar 26, 2026
    Archived
    Mar 26, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗