CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Mar 26, 2026

AI-Supervisor: Autonomous AI Research Supervision via a Persistent Research World Model

arXiv AI Archived Mar 26, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2603.24402v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Existing automated research systems operate as stateless, linear pipelines, generating outputs without maintaining a persistent understanding of the research landscape. They process papers sequentially, propose ideas without structured gap analysis, and lack mechanisms for agents to verify or refine each other's findings. We present AutoProf (Autonomous Professor), a multi-agent orchestration framework where specialized agents provide end-to-end AI

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 25 Mar 2026] AI-Supervisor: Autonomous AI Research Supervision via a Persistent Research World Model Yunbo Long Existing automated research systems operate as stateless, linear pipelines, generating outputs without maintaining a persistent understanding of the research landscape. They process papers sequentially, propose ideas without structured gap analysis, and lack mechanisms for agents to verify or refine each other's findings. We present AutoProf (Autonomous Professor), a multi-agent orchestration framework where specialized agents provide end-to-end AI research supervision driven by human interests, from literature review through gap discovery, method development, evaluation, and paper writing, via autonomous exploration and self-correcting updates. Unlike sequential pipelines, AutoProf maintains a continuously evolving Research World Model implemented as a Knowledge Graph, capturing methods, benchmarks, limitations, and unexplored gaps as shared memory across agents. The framework introduces three contributions: first, structured gap discovery that decomposes methods into modules, evaluates them across benchmarks, and identifies module-level gaps; second, self-correcting discovery loops that analyze why modules succeed or fail, detect benchmark biases, and assess evaluation adequacy; third, self-improving development loops using cross-domain mechanism search to iteratively address failing components. All agents operate under a consensus mechanism where findings are validated before being committed to the shared model. The framework is model-agnostic, supports mainstream large language models, and scales elastically with token budget from lightweight exploration to full-scale investigation. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2603.24402 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2603.24402v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.24402 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Yunbo Long [view email] [v1] Wed, 25 Mar 2026 15:16:51 UTC (3,642 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-03 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Mar 26, 2026
    Archived
    Mar 26, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗