AI-Supervisor: Autonomous AI Research Supervision via a Persistent Research World Model
arXiv AIArchived Mar 26, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2603.24402v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Existing automated research systems operate as stateless, linear pipelines, generating outputs without maintaining a persistent understanding of the research landscape. They process papers sequentially, propose ideas without structured gap analysis, and lack mechanisms for agents to verify or refine each other's findings. We present AutoProf (Autonomous Professor), a multi-agent orchestration framework where specialized agents provide end-to-end AI
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 25 Mar 2026]
AI-Supervisor: Autonomous AI Research Supervision via a Persistent Research World Model
Yunbo Long
Existing automated research systems operate as stateless, linear pipelines, generating outputs without maintaining a persistent understanding of the research landscape. They process papers sequentially, propose ideas without structured gap analysis, and lack mechanisms for agents to verify or refine each other's findings. We present AutoProf (Autonomous Professor), a multi-agent orchestration framework where specialized agents provide end-to-end AI research supervision driven by human interests, from literature review through gap discovery, method development, evaluation, and paper writing, via autonomous exploration and self-correcting updates. Unlike sequential pipelines, AutoProf maintains a continuously evolving Research World Model implemented as a Knowledge Graph, capturing methods, benchmarks, limitations, and unexplored gaps as shared memory across agents. The framework introduces three contributions: first, structured gap discovery that decomposes methods into modules, evaluates them across benchmarks, and identifies module-level gaps; second, self-correcting discovery loops that analyze why modules succeed or fail, detect benchmark biases, and assess evaluation adequacy; third, self-improving development loops using cross-domain mechanism search to iteratively address failing components. All agents operate under a consensus mechanism where findings are validated before being committed to the shared model. The framework is model-agnostic, supports mainstream large language models, and scales elastically with token budget from lightweight exploration to full-scale investigation.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.24402 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2603.24402v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.24402
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Yunbo Long [view email]
[v1] Wed, 25 Mar 2026 15:16:51 UTC (3,642 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-03
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)