DUPLEX: Agentic Dual-System Planning via LLM-Driven Information Extraction
arXiv AIArchived Mar 26, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2603.23909v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While Large Language Models (LLMs) provide semantic flexibility for robotic task planning, their susceptibility to hallucination and logical inconsistency limits their reliability in long-horizon domains. To bridge the gap between unstructured environments and rigorous plan synthesis, we propose DUPLEX, an agentic dual-system neuro-symbolic architecture that strictly confines the LLM to schema-guided information extraction rather than end-to-end pl
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 25 Mar 2026]
DUPLEX: Agentic Dual-System Planning via LLM-Driven Information Extraction
Keru Hua, Ding Wang, Yaoying Gu, Xiaoguang Ma
While Large Language Models (LLMs) provide semantic flexibility for robotic task planning, their susceptibility to hallucination and logical inconsistency limits their reliability in long-horizon domains. To bridge the gap between unstructured environments and rigorous plan synthesis, we propose DUPLEX, an agentic dual-system neuro-symbolic architecture that strictly confines the LLM to schema-guided information extraction rather than end-to-end planning or code generation. In our framework, a feed-forward Fast System utilizes a lightweight LLM to extract entities, relations etc. from natural language, deterministically mapping them into a Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL) problem file for a classical symbolic planner. To resolve complex or underspecified scenarios, a Slow System is activated exclusively upon planning failure, leveraging solver diagnostics to drive a high-capacity LLM in iterative reflection and repair. Extensive evaluations across 12 classical and household planning domains demonstrate that DUPLEX significantly outperforms existing end-to-end and hybrid LLM baselines in both success rate and reliability. These results confirm that The key is not to make the LLM plan better, but to restrict the LLM to the part it is good at - structured semantic grounding - and leave logical plan synthesis to a symbolic planner.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.23909 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2603.23909v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.23909
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Ding Wang [view email]
[v1] Wed, 25 Mar 2026 03:57:44 UTC (233 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-03
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)