SCoOP: Semantic Consistent Opinion Pooling for Uncertainty Quantification in Multiple Vision-Language Model Systems
arXiv AIArchived Mar 26, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2603.23853v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Combining multiple Vision-Language Models (VLMs) can enhance multimodal reasoning and robustness, but aggregating heterogeneous models' outputs amplifies uncertainty and increases the risk of hallucinations. We propose SCoOP (Semantic-Consistent Opinion Pooling), a training-free uncertainty quantification (UQ) framework multi-VLM systems through uncertainty-weighted linear opinion pooling. Unlike prior UQ methods designed for single models, SCoOP e
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 25 Mar 2026]
SCoOP: Semantic Consistent Opinion Pooling for Uncertainty Quantification in Multiple Vision-Language Model Systems
Chung-En Johnny Yu, Brian Jalaian, Nathaniel D. Bastian
Combining multiple Vision-Language Models (VLMs) can enhance multimodal reasoning and robustness, but aggregating heterogeneous models' outputs amplifies uncertainty and increases the risk of hallucinations. We propose SCoOP (Semantic-Consistent Opinion Pooling), a training-free uncertainty quantification (UQ) framework multi-VLM systems through uncertainty-weighted linear opinion pooling. Unlike prior UQ methods designed for single models, SCoOP explicitly measures collective, system-level uncertainty across multiple VLMs, enabling effective hallucination detection and abstention for highly uncertain samples. On ScienceQA, SCoOP achieves an AUROC of 0.866 for hallucination detection, outperforming baselines (0.732-0.757) by approximately 10-13%. For abstention, it attains an AURAC of 0.907, exceeding baselines (0.818-0.840) by 7-9%. Despite these gains, SCoOP introduces only microsecond-level aggregation overhead relative to the baselines, which is trivial compared to typical VLM inference time (on the order of seconds). These results demonstrate that SCoOP provides an efficient and principled mechanism for uncertainty-aware aggregation, advancing the reliability of multimodal AI systems.
Comments: Accepted to ICLR 2024 Workshop on Agentic AI in the Wild: From Hallucinations to Reliable Autonomy
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.23853 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2603.23853v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.23853
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Chung-En Johnny Yu [view email]
[v1] Wed, 25 Mar 2026 02:30:48 UTC (1,921 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-03
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.MA
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)