CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Mar 26, 2026

Efficient Benchmarking of AI Agents

arXiv AI Archived Mar 26, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2603.23749v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluating AI agents on comprehensive benchmarks is expensive because each evaluation requires interactive rollouts with tool use and multi-step reasoning. We study whether small task subsets can preserve agent rankings at substantially lower cost. Unlike static language model benchmarks, agent evaluation is subject to scaffold-driven distribution shift, since performance depends on the framework wrapping the underlying model. Across eight benchmar

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 24 Mar 2026] Efficient Benchmarking of AI Agents Franck Ndzomga Evaluating AI agents on comprehensive benchmarks is expensive because each evaluation requires interactive rollouts with tool use and multi-step reasoning. We study whether small task subsets can preserve agent rankings at substantially lower cost. Unlike static language model benchmarks, agent evaluation is subject to scaffold-driven distribution shift, since performance depends on the framework wrapping the underlying model. Across eight benchmarks, 33 agent scaffolds, and 70+ model configurations, we find that absolute score prediction degrades under this shift, while rank-order prediction remains stable. Exploiting this asymmetry, we propose a simple optimization-free protocol: evaluate new agents only on tasks with intermediate historical pass rates (30-70%). This mid-range difficulty filter, motivated by Item Response Theory, reduces the number of evaluation tasks by 44-70% while maintaining high rank fidelity under scaffold and temporal shifts. It provides more reliable rankings than random sampling, which exhibits high variance across seeds, and outperforms greedy task selection under distribution shift. These results suggest that reliable leaderboard ranking does not require full-benchmark evaluation. Comments: 22 pages, 7 figures, 5 tables Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2603.23749 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2603.23749v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.23749 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Franck Stéphane Ndzomga [view email] [v1] Tue, 24 Mar 2026 22:17:11 UTC (250 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-03 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Mar 26, 2026
    Archived
    Mar 26, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗