Can LLM Agents Be CFOs? A Benchmark for Resource Allocation in Dynamic Enterprise Environments
arXiv AIArchived Mar 26, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2603.23638v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have enabled agentic systems that can reason, plan, and act across complex tasks, but it remains unclear whether they can allocate resources effectively under uncertainty. Unlike short-horizon reactive decisions, allocation requires committing scarce resources over time while balancing competing objectives and preserving flexibility for future needs. We introduce EnterpriseArena, the first benchmark for evaluating agent
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 24 Mar 2026]
Can LLM Agents Be CFOs? A Benchmark for Resource Allocation in Dynamic Enterprise Environments
Yi Han, Lingfei Qian, Yan Wang, Yueru He, Xueqing Peng, Dongji Feng, Yankai Chen, Haohang Li, Yupeng Cao, Jimin Huang, Xue Liu, Jian-Yun Nie, Sophia Ananiadou
Large language models (LLMs) have enabled agentic systems that can reason, plan, and act across complex tasks, but it remains unclear whether they can allocate resources effectively under uncertainty. Unlike short-horizon reactive decisions, allocation requires committing scarce resources over time while balancing competing objectives and preserving flexibility for future needs. We introduce EnterpriseArena, the first benchmark for evaluating agents on long-horizon enterprise resource allocation. It instantiates CFO-style decision-making in a 132-month enterprise simulator combining firm-level financial data, anonymized business documents, macroeconomic and industry signals, and expert-validated operating rules. The environment is partially observable and reveals the state only through budgeted organizational tools, forcing agents to trade off information acquisition against conserving scarce resources. Experiments on eleven advanced LLMs show that this setting remains highly challenging: only 16% of runs survive the full horizon, and larger models do not reliably outperform smaller ones. These results identify long-horizon resource allocation under uncertainty as a distinct capability gap for current LLM agents.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.23638 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2603.23638v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.23638
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Yi Han [view email]
[v1] Tue, 24 Mar 2026 18:25:00 UTC (3,933 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-03
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)