CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Mar 26, 2026

PLDR-LLMs Reason At Self-Organized Criticality

arXiv AI Archived Mar 26, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2603.23539v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We show that PLDR-LLMs pretrained at self-organized criticality exhibit reasoning at inference time. The characteristics of PLDR-LLM deductive outputs at criticality is similar to second-order phase transitions. At criticality, the correlation length diverges, and the deductive outputs attain a metastable steady state. The steady state behaviour suggests that deductive outputs learn representations equivalent to scaling functions, universality clas

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 12 Mar 2026] PLDR-LLMs Reason At Self-Organized Criticality Burc Gokden We show that PLDR-LLMs pretrained at self-organized criticality exhibit reasoning at inference time. The characteristics of PLDR-LLM deductive outputs at criticality is similar to second-order phase transitions. At criticality, the correlation length diverges, and the deductive outputs attain a metastable steady state. The steady state behaviour suggests that deductive outputs learn representations equivalent to scaling functions, universality classes and renormalization groups from the training dataset, leading to generalization and reasoning capabilities in the process. We can then define an order parameter from the global statistics of the model's deductive output parameters at inference. The reasoning capabilities of a PLDR-LLM is better when its order parameter is close to zero at criticality. This observation is supported by the benchmark scores of the models trained at near-criticality and sub-criticality. Our results provide a self-contained explanation on how reasoning manifests in large language models, and the ability to reason can be quantified solely from global model parameter values of the deductive outputs at steady state, without any need for evaluation of curated benchmark datasets through inductive output for reasoning and comprehension. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Adaptation and Self-Organizing Systems (nlin.AO) Cite as: arXiv:2603.23539 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2603.23539v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.23539 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Burc Gokden [view email] [v1] Thu, 12 Mar 2026 19:09:06 UTC (839 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-03 Change to browse by: cs cs.CL cs.LG nlin nlin.AO References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Mar 26, 2026
    Archived
    Mar 26, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗