Blame Game: Why Public Cyber Attribution Carries Risks
Dark ReadingArchived Mar 25, 2026✓ Full text saved
Publicly accusing an entity of a cyberattack could have negative consequences that organizations should consider before taking the plunge.
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
CYBER RISK
THREAT INTELLIGENCE
CYBERSECURITY OPERATIONS
VULNERABILITIES & THREATS
NEWS
Blame Game: Why Public Cyber Attribution Carries Risks
Publicly accusing an entity of a cyberattack could have negative consequences that organizations should consider before taking the plunge.
Alexander Culafi,Senior News Writer,Dark Reading
March 25, 2026
4 Min Read
SOURCE: DESIGNER491 VIA ALAMY STOCK PHOTO
RSAC 2026 CONFERENCE – San Francisco – Questions about threat actor attribution, including how to do it and why you might want to hold off, are not as straightforward as they may first seem.
Attribution is a wide-ranging topic that mostly boils down to "Whodunnit?" for cyberattacks. Depending on the attack and various circumstances, you may read somewhere that a bespoke threat group, such as a ransomware gang, compromised an organization's network. Sometimes it's a "cluster," designed to connect a pattern of activity without strictly connecting a threat actor or nation to that activity with complete certainty. Often, a cybersecurity vendor will use their own custom naming taxnomy to track threat groups, like Salt Typhoon or Sandworm, even though the threat actors themselves would never use those names.
This gets more complicated when those names are used both as an internal signifier to describe a pattern of activity as well as a vendor marketing tool to share research or present a threat.
Related:Why a 'Near Miss' Database Is Key to Improving Information Sharing
A panel at RSAC 2026 Conference, titled "We Think It Was Them: The Perils of Attribution in Public Statements," dug into some of the questions of attribution that are not always asked: How often is attribution a sure thing? Should you always publicly attribute? What are the risks of attempting to attribute a threat actor? Axios reporter Sam Sabin hosted the panel, which featured FTI Consulting senior advisor Brett Callow, Institute for Security and Technology chief strategy officer Megan Stifel, and Cooley LLP partner Mike Egan.
Misconceptions Surrounding Threat Actor Attribution
Callow said that when it comes to attribution, a common misconception is that the process is definitive rather than probabilistic. He said it is almost always a case of it being "more likely than not that a particular entity was responsible, but that nuance doesn't always get carried out."
Egan agreed, saying it's rarely 100% clear an attacker conducted an attack unless the attacker wants their involvement known. That's without even considering the propensity for entities like ransomware groups to lie and take credit for attacks they might not be responsible for — another complicating factor in attribution.
He added that for some of his legal clients, a recurring misconception has been that attribution may divert responsibility from the defender and improve the narrative surrounding an attack because it gives the impression that there was no way to avoid something so sophisticated.
"We've had instances of that in the past where the FBI has come out and told the company, 'Listen, 99% of companies wouldn't be able to withstand this attack. This is a pure nation-state attack.' I get the attraction behind that, but it changes the narrative a bit and then can make some people a little bit more concerned," Egan explained. "Now all of a sudden, we're not talking about just a personal data breach and something bigger, and that story sticks around longer."
Related:Ex-NSA Directors Discuss 'Red Line' for Offensive Cyberattacks
Attribution and Risk
While firmly attributing an attack can seem appealing, the panelists said there are consequences to consider. Callow said that, on the whole, definitive attribution is "extremely risky" because it means bringing third parties into the discussion. "That could be a nation or it could be a for-profit criminal enterprise. In either case, whatever you say to them can attract considerable blowback and invite comments," he said.
Attribution may also impact things like cyber insurance coverage, the panelists said. For example, some insurance claims from victims of the NotPetya ransomware attacks in 2017 initially denied because the providers argued that the policies didn't cover acts of war. The ransomware attacks were initially directed at Ukraine before spreading to other countries and were attributed to Russian nation-state actors, specifically the notorious Sandworm threat group.
Related:With Government's Role Uncertain, Businesses Unite to Combat Fraud
However, there can also be risks to not attributing an attack. Stifel, who was previously an attorney in the National Security Division at the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), pointed out that, depending on the attack, if an organization declines to make an attribution case, that could signal acceptance or even assent of the behavior.
Sabin asked about situations where an entity (like a government, company, or a victim organization) isn't ready to make a concrete attribution but reality gets in the way; for example, if a reporter gets a scoop that an attack took place, it could put pressure on the victim organization. There are obvious risks for prematurely attributing an attack, even though victims may not want someone else to set a narrative for them. All three panelists approached the question from a different angle.
Stifel said that one option is to simply say "no comment" or acknowledge that the party is aware of reports or that an incident has occurred, and that investigation is ongoing. Egan, speaking from a legal perspective, advocated for keeping clients on the "no comment" line and letting the investigation play out. "Oftentimes the best answer is no answer. We're concentrating on the investigation."
Callow disagreed, at least in part.
"I don't think 'no comment' is ever a good response. If you don't fill that gap, somebody else will," he said. "You don't necessarily have to attribute the attack, but you should, for example, say the investigation is ongoing."
RSAC Conference
MAR 23, 2026 TO MAR 26, 2026
Join thousands of your peers at RSAC™ 2026 Conference in San Francisco from March 23–26. Discover new strategies, explore bold technologies, and connect with peers who share your challenges and ambitions. Don’t just attend the Conference—be part of the community that defines what’s next.
SECURE YOUR SPOT
About the Author
Alexander Culafi
Senior News Writer, Dark Reading
Alex is an award-winning writer, journalist, and podcast host based in Boston. After cutting his teeth writing for independent gaming publications as a teenager, he graduated from Emerson College in 2016 with a Bachelor of Science in journalism. He has previously been published on VentureFizz, Search Security, Nintendo World Report, and elsewhere. In his spare time, Alex hosts the weekly Nintendo podcast Talk Nintendo Podcast and works on personal writing projects, including two previously self-published science fiction novels.
Want more Dark Reading stories in your Google search results?
ADD US NOW
More Insights
Industry Reports
Frost Radar™: Non-human Identity Solutions
2026 CISO AI Risk Report
Cybersecurity Forecast 2026
The ROI of AI in Security
ThreatLabz 2025 Ransomware Report
Access More Research
Webinars
Building a Robust SOC in a Post-AI World
Retail Security: Protecting Customer Data and Payment Systems
Rethinking SSE: When Unified SASE Delivers the Flexibility Enterprises Need
Securing Remote and Hybrid Work Forecast: Beyond the VPN
AI-Powered Threat Detection: Beyond Traditional Security Models
More Webinars
You May Also Like
CYBER RISK
Dark Reading Confidential: A Guided Tour of Today's Dark Web
by Dark Reading Staff
AUG 28, 2025
CYBER RISK
'Venom Spider' Targets Hiring Managers in Phishing Scheme
by Alexander Culafi, Senior News Writer, Dark Reading
MAY 05, 2025
CYBERATTACKS & DATA BREACHES
DeepSeek Breach Opens Floodgates to Dark Web
by Emma Zaballos
APR 22, 2025
CYBER RISK
CISA Warns: Old DNS Trick 'Fast Flux' Is Still Thriving
by Nate Nelson, Contributing Writer
APR 04, 2025
Editor's Choice
CYBERSECURITY OPERATIONS
Why Stryker's Outage Is a Disaster Recovery Wake-Up Call
byJai Vijayan
MAR 12, 2026
5 MIN READ
CYBER RISK
What Orgs Can Learn From Olympics, World Cup IR Plans
byTara Seals
MAR 12, 2026
THREAT INTELLIGENCE
Commercial Spyware Opponents Fear US Policy Shifting
byRob Wright
MAR 12, 2026
9 MIN READ
Want more Dark Reading stories in your Google search results?
2026 Security Trends & Outlooks
THREAT INTELLIGENCE
Cybersecurity Predictions for 2026: Navigating the Future of Digital Threats
JAN 2, 2026
CYBER RISK
Navigating Privacy and Cybersecurity Laws in 2026 Will Prove Difficult
JAN 12, 2026
ENDPOINT SECURITY
CISOs Face a Tighter Insurance Market in 2026
JAN 5, 2026
THREAT INTELLIGENCE
2026: The Year Agentic AI Becomes the Attack-Surface Poster Child
JAN 30, 2026
Download the Collection
Keep up with the latest cybersecurity threats, newly discovered vulnerabilities, data breach information, and emerging trends. Delivered daily or weekly right to your email inbox.
SUBSCRIBE
Webinars
Building a Robust SOC in a Post-AI World
THURS, MARCH 19, 2026 AT 1PM EST
Retail Security: Protecting Customer Data and Payment Systems
THURS, APRIL 2, 2026 AT 1PM EST
Rethinking SSE: When Unified SASE Delivers the Flexibility Enterprises Need
WED, APRIL 1, 2026 AT 1PM EST
Securing Remote and Hybrid Work Forecast: Beyond the VPN
TUES, MARCH 10, 2026 AT 1PM EST
AI-Powered Threat Detection: Beyond Traditional Security Models
WED, MARCH 25, 2026 AT 1PM EST
More Webinars
White Papers
Autonomous Pentesting at Machine Speed, Without False Positives
Fixing Organizations' Identity Security Posture
Best practices for incident response planning
Industry Report: AI, SOC, and Modernizing Cybersecurity
The Threat Prevention Buyer's Guide: Find the best AI-driven threat protection solution to stop file-based attacks.
Explore More White Papers
GISEC GLOBAL 2026
GISEC GLOBAL is the most influential and the largest cybersecurity gathering in the Middle East & Africa, uniting global CISOs, government leaders, technology buyers, and ethical hackers for three power-packed days of innovation, strategy, and live cyber drills.
📌 BOOK YOUR SPACE