CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Mar 25, 2026

CLiGNet: Clinical Label-Interaction Graph Network for Medical Specialty Classification from Clinical Transcriptions

arXiv AI Archived Mar 25, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2603.22752v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Automated classification of clinical transcriptions into medical specialties is essential for routing, coding, and clinical decision support, yet prior work on the widely used MTSamples benchmark suffers from severe data leakage caused by applying SMOTE oversampling before train test splitting. We first document this methodological flaw and establish a leakage free benchmark across 40 medical specialties (4966 records), revealing that the true task

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 24 Mar 2026] CLiGNet: Clinical Label-Interaction Graph Network for Medical Specialty Classification from Clinical Transcriptions Pronob Kumar Barman, Pronoy Kumar Barman Automated classification of clinical transcriptions into medical specialties is essential for routing, coding, and clinical decision support, yet prior work on the widely used MTSamples benchmark suffers from severe data leakage caused by applying SMOTE oversampling before train test splitting. We first document this methodological flaw and establish a leakage free benchmark across 40 medical specialties (4966 records), revealing that the true task difficulty is substantially higher than previously reported. We then introduce CLiGNet (Clinical Label Interaction Graph Network), a neural architecture that combines a Bio ClinicalBERT text encoder with a two layer Graph Convolutional Network operating on a specialty label graph constructed from semantic similarity and ICD 10 chapter priors. Per label attention gates fuse document and label graph representations, trained with focal binary cross entropy loss to handle extreme class imbalance (181 to 1 ratio). Across seven baselines ranging from TF IDF classifiers to Clinical Longformer, CLiGNet without calibration achieves the highest macro F1 of 0.279, with an ablation study confirming that the GCN label graph provides the single largest component gain (increase of 0.066 macro F1). Adding per label Platt scaling calibration yields an expected calibration error of 0.007, demonstrating a principled trade off between ranking performance and probability reliability. We provide comprehensive failure analysis covering pairwise specialty confusions, rare class behaviour, document length effects, and token level Integrated Gradients attribution, offering actionable insights for clinical NLP system deployment. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2603.22752 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2603.22752v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.22752 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Pronob Kumar Barman [view email] [v1] Tue, 24 Mar 2026 03:30:06 UTC (18 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-03 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Mar 25, 2026
    Archived
    Mar 25, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗