CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Mar 25, 2026

Graph-Aware Late Chunking for Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Biomedical Literature

arXiv AI Archived Mar 25, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2603.22633v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems for biomedical literature are typically evaluated using ranking metrics like Mean Reciprocal Rank (MRR), which measure how well the system identifies the single most relevant chunk. We argue that for full-text scientific documents, this paradigm is incomplete: it rewards retrieval precision while ignoring retrieval breadth -- the ability to surface evidence from across a document's structural sections. W

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 23 Mar 2026] Graph-Aware Late Chunking for Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Biomedical Literature Pouria Mortezaagha, Arya Rahgozar Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems for biomedical literature are typically evaluated using ranking metrics like Mean Reciprocal Rank (MRR), which measure how well the system identifies the single most relevant chunk. We argue that for full-text scientific documents, this paradigm is incomplete: it rewards retrieval precision while ignoring retrieval breadth -- the ability to surface evidence from across a document's structural sections. We propose GraLC-RAG, a framework that unifies late chunking with graph-aware structural intelligence, introducing structure-aware chunk boundary detection, UMLS knowledge graph infusion, and graph-guided hybrid retrieval. We evaluate six strategies on 2,359 IMRaD-filtered PubMed Central articles using 2,033 cross-section questions and two metric families: standard ranking metrics (MRR, Recall@k) and structural coverage metrics (SecCov@k, CS Recall). Our results expose a sharp divergence: content-similarity methods achieve the highest MRR (0.517) but always retrieve from a single section, while structure-aware methods retrieve from up to 15.6x more sections. Generation experiments show that KG-infused retrieval narrows the answer-quality gap to delta-F1 = 0.009 while maintaining 4.6x section diversity. These findings demonstrate that standard metrics systematically undervalue structural retrieval and that closing the multi-section synthesis gap is a key open problem for biomedical RAG. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Information Retrieval (cs.IR) Cite as: arXiv:2603.22633 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2603.22633v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.22633 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Pouria Mortezaagha [view email] [v1] Mon, 23 Mar 2026 23:22:58 UTC (518 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-03 Change to browse by: cs cs.IR References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Mar 25, 2026
    Archived
    Mar 25, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗