TRAP: Hijacking VLA CoT-Reasoning via Adversarial Patches
arXiv SecurityArchived Mar 25, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2603.23117v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: By integrating Chain-of-Thought(CoT) reasoning, Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have demonstrated strong capabilities in robotic manipulation, particularly by improving generalization and interpretability. However, the security of CoT-based reasoning mechanisms remains largely unexplored. In this paper, we show that CoT reasoning introduces a novel attack vector for targeted control hijacking--for example, causing a robot to mistakenly deliver
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
[Submitted on 24 Mar 2026]
TRAP: Hijacking VLA CoT-Reasoning via Adversarial Patches
Zhengxian Huang, Wenjun Zhu, Haoxuan Qiu, Xiaoyu Ji, Wenyuan Xu
By integrating Chain-of-Thought(CoT) reasoning, Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have demonstrated strong capabilities in robotic manipulation, particularly by improving generalization and interpretability. However, the security of CoT-based reasoning mechanisms remains largely unexplored.
In this paper, we show that CoT reasoning introduces a novel attack vector for targeted control hijacking--for example, causing a robot to mistakenly deliver a knife to a person instead of an apple--without modifying the user's instruction. We first provide empirical evidence that CoT strongly governs action generation, even when it is semantically misaligned with the input instructions. Building on this observation, we propose TRAP, the first targeted adversarial attack framework for CoT-reasoning VLA models. TRAP uses an adversarial patch (e.g., a coaster placed on the table) to corrupt intermediate CoT reasoning and hijack the VLA's output. By optimizing the CoT adversarial loss, TRAP induces specific and adversary-defined behaviors. Extensive evaluations across 3 mainstream VLA architectures and 3 CoT reasoning paradigms validate the effectiveness of TRAP. Notably, we implemented the patch by printing it on paper in a real-world setting. Our findings highlight the urgent need to secure CoT reasoning in VLA systems.
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.23117 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2603.23117v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.23117
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Zhengxian Huang [view email]
[v1] Tue, 24 Mar 2026 12:14:12 UTC (3,101 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CR
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-03
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)