How Far Should We Need to Go : Evaluate Provenance-based Intrusion Detection Systems in Industrial Scenarios
arXiv SecurityArchived Mar 25, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2603.22982v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Provenance-based Intrusion Detection Systems (PIDSes) have been widely used to detect Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs). Although many studies achieve high performance in the evaluations of their original papers, their performance in industrial scenarios remains unclear. To fill this gap, we conduct the first systematic evaluation and analysis of PIDSes in industrial scenarios. We first analyze the differences between the data from DARPA datasets
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
[Submitted on 24 Mar 2026]
How Far Should We Need to Go : Evaluate Provenance-based Intrusion Detection Systems in Industrial Scenarios
Yue Xiao, Ling Jiang, Sen Nie, Ding Li, Shi Wu, Ke Xu, Qi Li
Provenance-based Intrusion Detection Systems (PIDSes) have been widely used to detect Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs). Although many studies achieve high performance in the evaluations of their original papers, their performance in industrial scenarios remains unclear. To fill this gap, we conduct the first systematic evaluation and analysis of PIDSes in industrial scenarios. We first analyze the differences between the data from DARPA datasets and that collected in industrial scenarios, identifying three main new characteristics in industry: heterogeneous multi-source inputs, more powerful attackers, and increasing benign activity complexity. We then build several datasets to evaluate five state-of-the-art PIDSes. The evaluation results reveal challenges for existing PIDSes, including poor portability across different hosts and platforms, low detection performance against real-world attacks, and high false positive rates with ever-changing benign activities. Based on the evaluation results and our industrial practices, we provide several insights to solve or explain the above problems. For example, we propose a method to mitigate the high false positives, which reduces manual effort by 2/3. Finally, we propose several research suggestions to improve PIDSes.
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.22982 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2603.22982v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.22982
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Yue Xiao [view email]
[v1] Tue, 24 Mar 2026 09:20:33 UTC (312 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CR
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-03
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)