CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Mar 25, 2026

How Far Should We Need to Go : Evaluate Provenance-based Intrusion Detection Systems in Industrial Scenarios

arXiv Security Archived Mar 25, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2603.22982v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Provenance-based Intrusion Detection Systems (PIDSes) have been widely used to detect Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs). Although many studies achieve high performance in the evaluations of their original papers, their performance in industrial scenarios remains unclear. To fill this gap, we conduct the first systematic evaluation and analysis of PIDSes in industrial scenarios. We first analyze the differences between the data from DARPA datasets

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Cryptography and Security [Submitted on 24 Mar 2026] How Far Should We Need to Go : Evaluate Provenance-based Intrusion Detection Systems in Industrial Scenarios Yue Xiao, Ling Jiang, Sen Nie, Ding Li, Shi Wu, Ke Xu, Qi Li Provenance-based Intrusion Detection Systems (PIDSes) have been widely used to detect Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs). Although many studies achieve high performance in the evaluations of their original papers, their performance in industrial scenarios remains unclear. To fill this gap, we conduct the first systematic evaluation and analysis of PIDSes in industrial scenarios. We first analyze the differences between the data from DARPA datasets and that collected in industrial scenarios, identifying three main new characteristics in industry: heterogeneous multi-source inputs, more powerful attackers, and increasing benign activity complexity. We then build several datasets to evaluate five state-of-the-art PIDSes. The evaluation results reveal challenges for existing PIDSes, including poor portability across different hosts and platforms, low detection performance against real-world attacks, and high false positive rates with ever-changing benign activities. Based on the evaluation results and our industrial practices, we provide several insights to solve or explain the above problems. For example, we propose a method to mitigate the high false positives, which reduces manual effort by 2/3. Finally, we propose several research suggestions to improve PIDSes. Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR) Cite as: arXiv:2603.22982 [cs.CR]   (or arXiv:2603.22982v1 [cs.CR] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.22982 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Yue Xiao [view email] [v1] Tue, 24 Mar 2026 09:20:33 UTC (312 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.CR < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-03 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv Security
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Mar 25, 2026
    Archived
    Mar 25, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗