A 67%-Rate CSS Code on the FCC Lattice: [[192,130,3]] from Weight-12 Stabilizers
arXiv QuantumArchived Mar 24, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2603.20294v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We construct a three-dimensional Calderbank-Shor-Steane (CSS) stabilizer code on the Face-Centered Cubic (FCC) lattice. Physical qubits reside on the edges of the lattice (coordination $K=12$); X-stabilizers act on octahedral voids and Z-stabilizers on vertices, both with uniform weight 12. Computational verification confirms CSS validity ($H_{X}H_{Z}^{T}=0$ over GF(2)) and reveals $k=2L^{3}+2$ logical qubits: $k=130$ at $L=4$ and $k=434$ at $L=6$,
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Quantum Physics
[Submitted on 19 Mar 2026]
A 67%-Rate CSS Code on the FCC Lattice: [[192,130,3]] from Weight-12 Stabilizers
Raghu Kulkarni
We construct a three-dimensional Calderbank-Shor-Steane (CSS) stabilizer code on the Face-Centered Cubic (FCC) lattice. Physical qubits reside on the edges of the lattice (coordination K=12); X-stabilizers act on octahedral voids and Z-stabilizers on vertices, both with uniform weight 12. Computational verification confirms CSS validity (H_{X}H_{Z}^{T}=0 over GF(2)) and reveals k=2L^{3}+2 logical qubits: k=130 at L=4 and k=434 at L=6, yielding encoding rates of 67.7% and 67.0% respectively. The minimum distance d=3 is proven exactly by exhaustive elimination of all weight-\le 2 candidates combined with constructive weight-3 non-stabilizer codewords. The code parameters are [[192, 130, 3]] at L=4 and [[648, 434, 3]] at L=6. This rate is 24x higher than the cubic 3D toric code (2.8% at d=4), though at a lower distance (d=3 vs. d=4); the comparison is across different distances. The high rate originates in a structural surplus: the FCC lattice has 3L^{3} edges but only L^{3}-2 independent stabilizer constraints, leaving k=2L^{3}+2 logical degrees of freedom. We provide a minimum-weight perfect matching (MWPM) decoder adapted to the FCC geometry, demonstrate a 10x coding gain at p=0.001 (and 63x at p=0.0005), and discuss implications for fault-tolerant quantum computing on neutral-atom and photonic platforms.
Comments: 14 pages, 2 figures, 3 tables, 2 appendices with reproducible Python code
Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
MSC classes: 81P73, 94B60, 52C17
ACM classes: E.4; J.2; F.2.2
Cite as: arXiv:2603.20294 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2603.20294v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.20294
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Raghu Kulkarni Mr [view email]
[v1] Thu, 19 Mar 2026 02:57:55 UTC (98 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
quant-ph
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-03
References & Citations
INSPIRE HEP
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)