Do LLM-Driven Agents Exhibit Engagement Mechanisms? Controlled Tests of Information Load, Descriptive Norms, and Popularity Cues
arXiv AIArchived Mar 24, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2603.20911v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models make agent-based simulation more behaviorally expressive, but they also sharpen a basic methodological tension: fluent, human-like output is not, by itself, evidence for theory. We evaluate what an LLM-driven simulation can credibly support using information engagement on social media as a test case. In a Weibo-like environment, we manipulate information load and descriptive norms, while allowing popularity cues (cumulative li
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 21 Mar 2026]
Do LLM-Driven Agents Exhibit Engagement Mechanisms? Controlled Tests of Information Load, Descriptive Norms, and Popularity Cues
Tai-Quan Peng, Yuan Tian, Songsong Liang, Dazhen Deng, Yingcai Wu
Large language models make agent-based simulation more behaviorally expressive, but they also sharpen a basic methodological tension: fluent, human-like output is not, by itself, evidence for theory. We evaluate what an LLM-driven simulation can credibly support using information engagement on social media as a test case. In a Weibo-like environment, we manipulate information load and descriptive norms, while allowing popularity cues (cumulative likes and Sina Weibo-style cumulative reshares) to evolve endogenously. We then ask whether simulated behavior changes in theoretically interpretable ways under these controlled variations, rather than merely producing plausible-looking traces. Engagement responds systematically to information load and descriptive norms, and sensitivity to popularity cues varies across contexts, indicating conditionality rather than rigid prompt compliance. We discuss methodological implications for simulation-based communication research, including multi-condition stress tests, explicit no-norm baselines because default prompts are not blank controls, and design choices that preserve endogenous feedback loops when studying bandwagon dynamics.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.20911 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2603.20911v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.20911
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Tai-Quan Peng [view email]
[v1] Sat, 21 Mar 2026 18:50:22 UTC (2,424 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-03
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CY
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)