Where can AI be used? Insights from a deep ontology of work activities
arXiv AIArchived Mar 24, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2603.20619v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) is poised to profoundly reshape how work is executed and organized, but we do not yet have deep frameworks for understanding where AI can be used. Here we provide a comprehensive ontology of work activities that can help systematically analyze and predict uses of AI. To do this, we disaggregate and then substantially reorganize the approximately 20K activities in the US Department of Labor's widely used O*NET occupation
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 21 Mar 2026]
Where can AI be used? Insights from a deep ontology of work activities
Alice Cai, Iman YeckehZaare, Shuo Sun, Vasiliki Charisi, Xinru Wang, Aiman Imran, Robert Laubacher, Alok Prakash, Thomas W. Malone
Artificial intelligence (AI) is poised to profoundly reshape how work is executed and organized, but we do not yet have deep frameworks for understanding where AI can be used. Here we provide a comprehensive ontology of work activities that can help systematically analyze and predict uses of AI. To do this, we disaggregate and then substantially reorganize the approximately 20K activities in the US Department of Labor's widely used O*NET occupational database. Next, we use this framework to classify descriptions of 13,275 AI software applications and a worldwide tally of 20.8 million robotic systems. Finally, we use the data about both these kinds of AI to generate graphical displays of how the estimated units and market values of all worldwide AI systems used today are distributed across the work activities that these systems help perform. We find a highly uneven distribution of AI market value across activities, with the top 1.6% of activities accounting for over 60% of AI market value. Most of the market value is used in information-based activities (72%), especially creating information (36%), and only 12% is used in physical activities. Interactive activities include both information-based and physical activities and account for 48% of AI market value, much of which (26%) involves transferring information. These results can be viewed as rough predictions of the AI applicability for all the different work activities down to very low levels of detail. Thus, we believe this systematic framework can help predict at a detailed level where today's AI systems can and cannot be used and how future AI capabilities may change this.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.20619 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2603.20619v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.20619
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Xinru Wang [view email]
[v1] Sat, 21 Mar 2026 03:28:39 UTC (24,295 KB)
Access Paper:
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-03
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CY
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)