CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Mar 24, 2026

LLM-Driven Heuristic Synthesis for Industrial Process Control: Lessons from Hot Steel Rolling

arXiv AI Archived Mar 24, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2603.20537v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Industrial process control demands policies that are interpretable and auditable, requirements that black-box neural policies struggle to meet. We study an LLM-driven heuristic synthesis framework for hot steel rolling, in which a language model iteratively proposes and refines human-readable Python controllers using rich behavioral feedback from a physics-based simulator. The framework combines structured strategic ideation, executable code genera

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 20 Mar 2026] LLM-Driven Heuristic Synthesis for Industrial Process Control: Lessons from Hot Steel Rolling Nima H. Siboni, Seyedreza Kiamousavi, Emad Scharifi Industrial process control demands policies that are interpretable and auditable, requirements that black-box neural policies struggle to meet. We study an LLM-driven heuristic synthesis framework for hot steel rolling, in which a language model iteratively proposes and refines human-readable Python controllers using rich behavioral feedback from a physics-based simulator. The framework combines structured strategic ideation, executable code generation, and per-component feedback across diverse operating conditions to search over control logic for height reduction, interpass time, and rolling velocity. Our first contribution is an auditable controller-synthesis pipeline for industrial process control. The generated controllers are explicit programs accessible to expert review, and we pair them with an automated audit pipeline that formally verifies key safety and monotonicity properties for the best synthesized heuristic. Our second contribution is a principled budget allocation strategy for LLM-driven heuristic search: we show that Luby-style universal restarts -- originally developed for randomized algorithms -- transfer directly to this setting, eliminating the need for problem-specific budget tuning. A single 160-iteration Luby campaign approaches the hindsight-optimal budget allocation derived from 52 ad-hoc runs totalling 730 iterations. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2603.20537 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2603.20537v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.20537 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Nima H. Siboni [view email] [v1] Fri, 20 Mar 2026 22:20:19 UTC (187 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-03 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Mar 24, 2026
    Archived
    Mar 24, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗