LLM-Driven Heuristic Synthesis for Industrial Process Control: Lessons from Hot Steel Rolling
arXiv AIArchived Mar 24, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2603.20537v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Industrial process control demands policies that are interpretable and auditable, requirements that black-box neural policies struggle to meet. We study an LLM-driven heuristic synthesis framework for hot steel rolling, in which a language model iteratively proposes and refines human-readable Python controllers using rich behavioral feedback from a physics-based simulator. The framework combines structured strategic ideation, executable code genera
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 20 Mar 2026]
LLM-Driven Heuristic Synthesis for Industrial Process Control: Lessons from Hot Steel Rolling
Nima H. Siboni, Seyedreza Kiamousavi, Emad Scharifi
Industrial process control demands policies that are interpretable and auditable, requirements that black-box neural policies struggle to meet. We study an LLM-driven heuristic synthesis framework for hot steel rolling, in which a language model iteratively proposes and refines human-readable Python controllers using rich behavioral feedback from a physics-based simulator. The framework combines structured strategic ideation, executable code generation, and per-component feedback across diverse operating conditions to search over control logic for height reduction, interpass time, and rolling velocity. Our first contribution is an auditable controller-synthesis pipeline for industrial process control. The generated controllers are explicit programs accessible to expert review, and we pair them with an automated audit pipeline that formally verifies key safety and monotonicity properties for the best synthesized heuristic. Our second contribution is a principled budget allocation strategy for LLM-driven heuristic search: we show that Luby-style universal restarts -- originally developed for randomized algorithms -- transfer directly to this setting, eliminating the need for problem-specific budget tuning. A single 160-iteration Luby campaign approaches the hindsight-optimal budget allocation derived from 52 ad-hoc runs totalling 730 iterations.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.20537 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2603.20537v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.20537
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Nima H. Siboni [view email]
[v1] Fri, 20 Mar 2026 22:20:19 UTC (187 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-03
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)