Deep reflective reasoning in interdependence constrained structured data extraction from clinical notes for digital health
arXiv AIArchived Mar 24, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2603.20435v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Extracting structured information from clinical notes requires navigating a dense web of interdependent variables where the value of one attribute logically constrains others. Existing Large Language Model (LLM)-based extraction pipelines often struggle to capture these dependencies, leading to clinically inconsistent outputs. We propose deep reflective reasoning, a large language model agent framework that iteratively self-critiques and revises st
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 20 Mar 2026]
Deep reflective reasoning in interdependence constrained structured data extraction from clinical notes for digital health
Jingwei Huang, Kuroush Nezafati, Zhikai Chi, Ruichen Rong, Colin Treager, Tingyi Wanyan, Yueshuang Xu, Xiaowei Zhan, Patrick Leavey, Guanghua Xiao, Wenqi Shi, Yang Xie
Extracting structured information from clinical notes requires navigating a dense web of interdependent variables where the value of one attribute logically constrains others. Existing Large Language Model (LLM)-based extraction pipelines often struggle to capture these dependencies, leading to clinically inconsistent outputs. We propose deep reflective reasoning, a large language model agent framework that iteratively self-critiques and revises structured outputs by checking consistency among variables, the input text, and retrieved domain knowledge, stopping when outputs converge. We extensively evaluate the proposed method in three diverse oncology applications: (1) On colorectal cancer synoptic reporting from gross descriptions (n=217), reflective reasoning improved average F1 across eight categorical synoptic variables from 0.828 to 0.911 and increased mean correct rate across four numeric variables from 0.806 to 0.895; (2) On Ewing sarcoma CD99 immunostaining pattern identification (n=200), the accuracy improved from 0.870 to 0.927; (3) On lung cancer tumor staging (n=100), tumor stage accuracy improved from 0.680 to 0.833 (pT: 0.842 -> 0.884; pN: 0.885 -> 0.948). The results demonstrate that deep reflective reasoning can systematically improve the reliability of LLM-based structured data extraction under interdependence constraints, enabling more consistent machine-operable clinical datasets and facilitating knowledge discovery with machine learning and data science towards digital health.
Comments: 12 figures and 2 tables
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.20435 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2603.20435v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.20435
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Jingwei Huang [view email]
[v1] Fri, 20 Mar 2026 19:05:30 UTC (3,628 KB)
Access Paper:
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-03
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)