CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Mar 24, 2026

ProMAS: Proactive Error Forecasting for Multi-Agent Systems Using Markov Transition Dynamics

arXiv AI Archived Mar 24, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2603.20260v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The integration of Large Language Models into Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) has enabled the so-lution of complex, long-horizon tasks through collaborative reasoning. However, this collec-tive intelligence is inherently fragile, as a single logical fallacy can rapidly propagate and lead to system-wide failure. Most current research re-lies on post-hoc failure analysis, thereby hinder-ing real-time intervention. To address this, we propose PROMAS, a proa

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 12 Mar 2026] ProMAS: Proactive Error Forecasting for Multi-Agent Systems Using Markov Transition Dynamics Xinkui Zhao, Sai Liu, Yifan Zhang, Qingyu Ma, Guanjie Cheng, Naibo Wang, Chang Liu The integration of Large Language Models into Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) has enabled the so-lution of complex, long-horizon tasks through collaborative reasoning. However, this collec-tive intelligence is inherently fragile, as a single logical fallacy can rapidly propagate and lead to system-wide failure. Most current research re-lies on post-hoc failure analysis, thereby hinder-ing real-time intervention. To address this, we propose PROMAS, a proactive framework utiliz-ing Markov transitions for predictive error anal-ysis. PROMAS extracts Causal Delta Features to capture semantic displacement, mapping them to a quantized Vector Markov Space to model reasoning as probabilistic transitions. By inte-grating a Proactive Prediction Head with Jump Detection, the method localizes errors via risk acceleration rather than static thresholds. On the Who&When benchmark, PROMAS achieves 22.97% step-level accuracy while processing only 27% of reasoning logs. This performance rivals reactive monitors like MASC while reducing data overhead by 73%. Although this strategy entails an accuracy trade-off compared to post-hoc meth-ods, it significantly improves intervention latency, balancing diagnostic precision with the real-time demands of autonomous reasoning. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2603.20260 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2603.20260v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.20260 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Yifan Zhang [view email] [v1] Thu, 12 Mar 2026 07:02:39 UTC (778 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-03 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Mar 24, 2026
    Archived
    Mar 24, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗