CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Mar 24, 2026

Memory poisoning and secure multi-agent systems

arXiv Security Archived Mar 24, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2603.20357v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Memory poisoning attacks for Agentic AI and multi-agent systems (MAS) have recently caught attention. It is partially due to the fact that Large Language Models (LLMs) facilitate the construction and deployment of agents. Different memory systems are being used nowadays in this context, including semantic, episodic, and short-term memory. This distinction between the different types of memory systems focuses mostly on their duration but also on the

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Cryptography and Security [Submitted on 20 Mar 2026] Memory poisoning and secure multi-agent systems Vicenç Torra, Maria Bras-Amorós Memory poisoning attacks for Agentic AI and multi-agent systems (MAS) have recently caught attention. It is partially due to the fact that Large Language Models (LLMs) facilitate the construction and deployment of agents. Different memory systems are being used nowadays in this context, including semantic, episodic, and short-term memory. This distinction between the different types of memory systems focuses mostly on their duration but also on their origin and their localization. It ranges from the short-term memory originated at the user's end localized in the different agents to the long-term consolidated memory localized in well established knowledge databases. In this paper, we first present the main types of memory systems, we then discuss the feasibility of memory poisoning attacks in these different types of memory systems, and we propose mitigation strategies. We review the already existing security solutions to mitigate some of the alleged attacks, and we discuss adapted solutions based on cryptography. We propose to implement local inference based on private knowledge retrieval as an example of mitigation strategy for memory poisoning for semantic memory. We also emphasize actual risks in relation to interactions between agents, which can cause memory poisoning. These latter risks are not so much studied in the literature and are difficult to formalize and solve. Thus, we contribute to the construction of agents that are secure by design. Comments: 15 pages, 2 figures Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) ACM classes: I.2.11 Cite as: arXiv:2603.20357 [cs.CR]   (or arXiv:2603.20357v1 [cs.CR] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.20357 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Vicenc Torra [view email] [v1] Fri, 20 Mar 2026 14:27:46 UTC (23 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.CR < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-03 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv Security
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Mar 24, 2026
    Archived
    Mar 24, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗