Grounded Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Drafting of Radiology Impressions Using Case-Based Similarity Search
arXiv AIArchived Mar 23, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2603.17765v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Automated radiology report generation has gained increasing attention with the rise of deep learning and large language models. However, fully generative approaches often suffer from hallucinations and lack clinical grounding, limiting their reliability in real-world workflows. In this study, we propose a multimodal retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) system for grounded drafting of chest radiograph impressions. The system combines contrastive i
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Quantitative Biology > Quantitative Methods
[Submitted on 18 Mar 2026]
Grounded Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Drafting of Radiology Impressions Using Case-Based Similarity Search
Himadri Samanta
Automated radiology report generation has gained increasing attention with the rise of deep learning and large language models. However, fully generative approaches often suffer from hallucinations and lack clinical grounding, limiting their reliability in real-world workflows. In this study, we propose a multimodal retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) system for grounded drafting of chest radiograph impressions. The system combines contrastive image-text embeddings, case-based similarity retrieval, and citation-constrained draft generation to ensure factual alignment with historical radiology reports. A curated subset of the MIMIC-CXR dataset was used to construct a multimodal retrieval database. Image embeddings were generated using CLIP encoders, while textual embeddings were derived from structured impression sections. A fusion similarity framework was implemented using FAISS indexing for scalable nearest-neighbor retrieval. Retrieved cases were used to construct grounded prompts for draft impression generation, with safety mechanisms enforcing citation coverage and confidence-based refusal. Experimental results demonstrate that multimodal fusion significantly improves retrieval performance compared to image-only retrieval, achieving Recall@5 above 0.95 on clinically relevant findings. The grounded drafting pipeline produces interpretable outputs with explicit citation traceability, enabling improved trustworthiness compared to conventional generative approaches. This work highlights the potential of retrieval-augmented multimodal systems for reliable clinical decision support and radiology workflow augmentation
Comments: 15 pages, 4 figures, 3 tables
Subjects: Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.17765 [q-bio.QM]
(or arXiv:2603.17765v1 [q-bio.QM] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.17765
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Himadri Samanta [view email]
[v1] Wed, 18 Mar 2026 14:25:50 UTC (459 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
q-bio.QM
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-03
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI
cs.CV
q-bio
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)