LISAA: A Framework for Large Language Model Information Security Awareness Assessment
arXiv SecurityArchived Mar 23, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2411.13207v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The popularity of large language models (LLMs) continues to grow, and LLM-based assistants have become ubiquitous. Information security awareness (ISA) is an important yet underexplored area of LLM safety. ISA encompasses LLMs' security knowledge, which has been explored in the past, as well as their attitudes and behaviors, which are crucial to LLMs' ability to understand implicit security context and reject unsafe requests that may cause an L
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
[Submitted on 20 Nov 2024 (v1), last revised 19 Mar 2026 (this version, v3)]
LISAA: A Framework for Large Language Model Information Security Awareness Assessment
Ofir Cohen, Gil Ari Agmon, Asaf Shabtai, Rami Puzis
The popularity of large language models (LLMs) continues to grow, and LLM-based assistants have become ubiquitous. Information security awareness (ISA) is an important yet underexplored area of LLM safety. ISA encompasses LLMs' security knowledge, which has been explored in the past, as well as their attitudes and behaviors, which are crucial to LLMs' ability to understand implicit security context and reject unsafe requests that may cause an LLM to unintentionally fail the user. We introduce LISAA, a comprehensive framework to assess LLM ISA. The proposed framework applies an automated measurement method to a comprehensive set of 100 realistic scenarios covering all security topics in an ISA taxonomy. These scenarios create tension between implicit security implications and user satisfaction. Applying our LISAA framework to leading LLMs highlights a widespread vulnerability affecting current deployments: many popular models exhibit only medium to low ISA levels, exposing their users to cybersecurity threats, and models that rank highly in cybersecurity knowledge benchmarks sometimes achieve relatively low ISA ranking. In addition, we found that smaller variants of the same model family are significantly riskier. Furthermore, while newer model versions demonstrated notable improvements, meaningful gaps in their ISA persist, suggesting that there is room for improvement. We release an online tool that implements our framework and enables the evaluation of new models.
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2411.13207 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2411.13207v3 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.13207
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Asaf Shabtai [view email]
[v1] Wed, 20 Nov 2024 11:09:55 UTC (2,126 KB)
[v2] Fri, 5 Sep 2025 04:24:34 UTC (10,418 KB)
[v3] Thu, 19 Mar 2026 22:34:14 UTC (11,061 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CR
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2024-11
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI
cs.LG
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)