Slips: Behavioral Evidence Aggregation for Network Security
arXiv SecurityArchived Aug 13, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2608.11979v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Network intrusion detection systems often analyze individual packets or flows, although malicious behavior may develop across many connections and over time. This may limit their ability to combine isolated detections into a coherent assessment of host behavior. Packet-level features may also be too low-level for complex AI-based detection, requiring additional processing to improve accuracy while maintaining a low false-positive rate. We present S
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
[Submitted on 12 Aug 2026]
Slips: Behavioral Evidence Aggregation for Network Security
Sebastian Garcia, Veronica Valeros, Alya Gomaa, Ondřej Lukáš, Martin Řepa, Lukáš Forst, David Otta, František Střasák, Jan Svoboda, Dita Hollmannová
Network intrusion detection systems often analyze individual packets or flows, although malicious behavior may develop across many connections and over time. This may limit their ability to combine isolated detections into a coherent assessment of host behavior. Packet-level features may also be too low-level for complex AI-based detection, requiring additional processing to improve accuracy while maintaining a low false-positive rate.
We present Slips, a network intrusion detection system that builds host-centered behavioral profiles and organizes activity into time windows. It uses a modular architecture in which independent modules report evidence rather than generating final alerts directly. Slips then accumulates this evidence into host-level decisions. We evaluate Slips against Suricata on an expert-labeled PCAP dataset. At the profile-time-window level, Slips achieved 83% higher recall and a 70% higher F1 score than Suricata, while neither system produced false positives. These results indicate that time-window-based evidence accumulation can produce context-aware decisions that better align with expert judgment.
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.11979 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2608.11979v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.11979
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Veronica Valeros [view email]
[v1] Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:12:55 UTC (1,462 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CR
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-08
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)