Cross-Corpus Evaluation of Generalizable Vulnerability Detection in IoT Firmware
arXiv SecurityArchived Aug 13, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2608.11492v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: IoT firmware vulnerability detection remains challenging due to heterogeneous firmware ecosystems, resource-constrained platforms, and limitations in existing benchmarks. Many datasets are synthetic or general-purpose and lack human-verified, contamination-screened annotations, limiting evidence on cross-corpus generalization across training sources, model architectures, and curriculum strategies. To address this gap, this paper introduces IoTVulBe
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
[Submitted on 11 Aug 2026]
Cross-Corpus Evaluation of Generalizable Vulnerability Detection in IoT Firmware
Sadib Hassan Rumman, Md. Shariful Islam, Md. Rayhanur Rahman
IoT firmware vulnerability detection remains challenging due to heterogeneous firmware ecosystems, resource-constrained platforms, and limitations in existing benchmarks. Many datasets are synthetic or general-purpose and lack human-verified, contamination-screened annotations, limiting evidence on cross-corpus generalization across training sources, model architectures, and curriculum strategies. To address this gap, this paper introduces IoTVulBench, a human-verified benchmark for cross-corpus firmware vulnerability detection. IoTVulBench-Core was constructed from GitHub repositories, validated by three expert reviewers, and evaluated on a contamination-screened held-out target across five model architectures, two tuning methods, and three curriculum strategies, with ensemble, distillation, and robustness analyses. Models trained on IoTVulBench achieved the highest MCC among matched single-source datasets, reaching 0.58 versus 0.44 for PrimeVul and 0.39 for D2A. Staged curriculum learning increased MCC to 0.69, while a diversity-optimized ensemble achieved 0.73, improving by 0.42 MCC over the strongest reference comparator, a static analyzer at 0.31, and by 0.29 over PrimeVul. At a 0.5% false-positive rate, the model missed only 21% of vulnerabilities, compared with 71% for the strongest comparator. It retained 86% of its performance under identifier renaming and demonstrated strong calibration and largely faithful explanations. These findings indicate that domain-matched training data and curriculum design, rather than model scale alone, are key drivers of generalization in firmware vulnerability detection. The results provide a benchmark for future research and deployment-ready configurations for practical IoT security applications.
Comments: 6 pages, 1 Figure, 2 Tables
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.11492 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2608.11492v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.11492
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Sadib Hassan Rumman [view email]
[v1] Tue, 11 Aug 2026 23:05:27 UTC (248 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CR
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-08
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.LG
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)