CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Aug 13, 2026

Cross-Corpus Evaluation of Generalizable Vulnerability Detection in IoT Firmware

arXiv Security Archived Aug 13, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2608.11492v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: IoT firmware vulnerability detection remains challenging due to heterogeneous firmware ecosystems, resource-constrained platforms, and limitations in existing benchmarks. Many datasets are synthetic or general-purpose and lack human-verified, contamination-screened annotations, limiting evidence on cross-corpus generalization across training sources, model architectures, and curriculum strategies. To address this gap, this paper introduces IoTVulBe

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Cryptography and Security [Submitted on 11 Aug 2026] Cross-Corpus Evaluation of Generalizable Vulnerability Detection in IoT Firmware Sadib Hassan Rumman, Md. Shariful Islam, Md. Rayhanur Rahman IoT firmware vulnerability detection remains challenging due to heterogeneous firmware ecosystems, resource-constrained platforms, and limitations in existing benchmarks. Many datasets are synthetic or general-purpose and lack human-verified, contamination-screened annotations, limiting evidence on cross-corpus generalization across training sources, model architectures, and curriculum strategies. To address this gap, this paper introduces IoTVulBench, a human-verified benchmark for cross-corpus firmware vulnerability detection. IoTVulBench-Core was constructed from GitHub repositories, validated by three expert reviewers, and evaluated on a contamination-screened held-out target across five model architectures, two tuning methods, and three curriculum strategies, with ensemble, distillation, and robustness analyses. Models trained on IoTVulBench achieved the highest MCC among matched single-source datasets, reaching 0.58 versus 0.44 for PrimeVul and 0.39 for D2A. Staged curriculum learning increased MCC to 0.69, while a diversity-optimized ensemble achieved 0.73, improving by 0.42 MCC over the strongest reference comparator, a static analyzer at 0.31, and by 0.29 over PrimeVul. At a 0.5% false-positive rate, the model missed only 21% of vulnerabilities, compared with 71% for the strongest comparator. It retained 86% of its performance under identifier renaming and demonstrated strong calibration and largely faithful explanations. These findings indicate that domain-matched training data and curriculum design, rather than model scale alone, are key drivers of generalization in firmware vulnerability detection. The results provide a benchmark for future research and deployment-ready configurations for practical IoT security applications. Comments: 6 pages, 1 Figure, 2 Tables Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Machine Learning (cs.LG) Cite as: arXiv:2608.11492 [cs.CR]   (or arXiv:2608.11492v1 [cs.CR] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.11492 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Sadib Hassan Rumman [view email] [v1] Tue, 11 Aug 2026 23:05:27 UTC (248 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.CR < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: cs cs.LG References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv Security
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Aug 13, 2026
    Archived
    Aug 13, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗