CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Aug 12, 2026

Synthesizing Probabilistic Saturating Counters with Differentially Private Formal Guarantees

arXiv Security Archived Aug 12, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2608.10521v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Branch predictors improve instruction-level parallelism in modern processors and are commonly modeled using saturating counters. However, classical saturating counters are deterministic and thus vulnerable to side-channel attacks: an attacker can manipulate the counter state and infer the branch direction of a victim process. Probabilistic saturating counters (PSCs) have been proposed to mitigate this leakage by randomizing counter updates, but exi

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Cryptography and Security [Submitted on 11 Aug 2026] Synthesizing Probabilistic Saturating Counters with Differentially Private Formal Guarantees Zhiming Chi, Lutan Zhao, Depeng Liu, Yong Li, Pengfei Yang, Bow-Yaw Wang, Rui Hou, Cheng-Chao Huang, Andrea Turrini, Lijun Zhang, Naijun Zhan Branch predictors improve instruction-level parallelism in modern processors and are commonly modeled using saturating counters. However, classical saturating counters are deterministic and thus vulnerable to side-channel attacks: an attacker can manipulate the counter state and infer the branch direction of a victim process. Probabilistic saturating counters (PSCs) have been proposed to mitigate this leakage by randomizing counter updates, but existing evaluations are mainly empirical. In this paper, we give a formal analysis based on differential privacy (DP): we model PSCs and the corresponding Prime+Probe attack strategies as probabilistic Moore machines, derive optimal attack strategies, and quantify the attacker's distinguishing power through DP. Our DP guarantee applies to the PSC primitive under the Prime+Probe observation model; end-to-end security for a full branch predictor under repeated or adaptive attacks is an important direction for future work. We then synthesize parameters for an enhanced PSC that satisfies a target pure DP guarantee. To evaluate utility, we derive the stationary misprediction rate and validate the theoretical predictions on benchmark programs. Compared to deterministic and existing probabilistic saturating counters, the synthesized PSCs provide formal security guarantees while preserving competitive prediction performance. Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Hardware Architecture (cs.AR); Formal Languages and Automata Theory (cs.FL) Cite as: arXiv:2608.10521 [cs.CR]   (or arXiv:2608.10521v1 [cs.CR] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.10521 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Zhiming Chi [view email] [v1] Tue, 11 Aug 2026 05:51:27 UTC (4,355 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.CR < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: cs cs.AR cs.FL References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv Security
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Aug 12, 2026
    Archived
    Aug 12, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗