Simulating Quantum Error Correction beyond Pauli Stochastic Errors
arXiv QuantumArchived Mar 20, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2603.18457v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Quantum error correction (QEC), the lynchpin of fault-tolerant quantum computing (FTQC), is designed and validated against well-behaved Pauli stochastic error models. But in real-world deployment, QEC protocols encounter a vast array of other errors -- coherent and non-Pauli errors -- whose impacts on quantum circuits are vastly different than those of stochastic Pauli errors. The impacts of these errors on QEC and FTQC protocols have been largely
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Quantum Physics
[Submitted on 19 Mar 2026]
Simulating Quantum Error Correction beyond Pauli Stochastic Errors
Jordan Hines, Corey Ostrove, Kenneth Rudinger, Stefan Seritan, Kevin Young, Robin Blume-Kohout, Timothy Proctor
Quantum error correction (QEC), the lynchpin of fault-tolerant quantum computing (FTQC), is designed and validated against well-behaved Pauli stochastic error models. But in real-world deployment, QEC protocols encounter a vast array of other errors -- coherent and non-Pauli errors -- whose impacts on quantum circuits are vastly different than those of stochastic Pauli errors. The impacts of these errors on QEC and FTQC protocols have been largely unpredictable to date due to exponential classical simulation cost. Here, we show how to accurately and efficiently model the effects of coherent and non-Pauli errors on FTQC, and we study the effects of such errors on syndrome extraction for surface and bivariate bicycle codes, and on magic state cultivation. Our analysis suggests that coherent error can shift fault-tolerance thresholds, increase the space-time cost of magic state cultivation, and can increase logical error rates by an order of magnitude compared to equivalent stochastic errors. These analyses are enabled by a new technique for mapping any Markovian circuit-level error model with sufficiently small error rates onto a detector error model (DEM) for an FTQC circuit. The resulting DEM enables Monte Carlo estimation of logical error rates and noise-adapted decoding, and its parameters can be analytically related to the underlying physical noise parameters to enable approximate strong simulation.
Comments: 11 pages+Appendices, 5+3 figures
Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.18457 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2603.18457v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.18457
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Jordan Hines [view email]
[v1] Thu, 19 Mar 2026 03:39:43 UTC (1,728 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
quant-ph
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-03
References & Citations
INSPIRE HEP
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)