TREAT: Evaluating Access to Formal Knowledge across Equivalent Mathematical Representations
arXiv AIArchived Aug 11, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2608.07540v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI systems increasingly operate between flexible input representations and formal objects used by downstream tools. A key challenge is recognizing when an unfamiliar formulation denotes a known formal object. We study this challenge through theorem recognition: given an equivalence-preserving transformation of a theorem condition, a model must recover the theorem identity associated with the standard statement. We introduce TREAT, a benchmark for e
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 29 Jul 2026]
TREAT: Evaluating Access to Formal Knowledge across Equivalent Mathematical Representations
Fateme Mazdarani, Carlos Toxtli
AI systems increasingly operate between flexible input representations and formal objects used by downstream tools. A key challenge is recognizing when an unfamiliar formulation denotes a known formal object. We study this challenge through theorem recognition: given an equivalence-preserving transformation of a theorem condition, a model must recover the theorem identity associated with the standard statement. We introduce TREAT, a benchmark for evaluating whether large language models can recover known theorem identities from equivalence-preserving formula-level transformations. Rather than paraphrasing theorem text, TREAT changes the mathematical form of theorem conditions themselves, expressing known results through residual equations, witness statements, optimization identities, set relations, operator forms, and proof-intermediate characterizations. Starting from scraped theorem pages, we filter for entries with usable mathematical expression forms, extract canonical theorem conditions, and generate transformed variants with recorded assumptions and inverse mappings. The final corpus contains 737 theorem identities and 29,480 transformed rows. On a test panel, the best model retrieves the correct theorem identity in only 60.73% of cases. Other systems reveal different failure modes, including abstention, wrong detection, and malformed outputs. These suggest that theorem knowledge can be fragile under equivalent changes in representation. TREAT therefore provides a controlled testbed for evaluating representation-robust access to formal knowledge, with broader relevance to domains that require stable target objects, explicit equivalence relations, validation procedures, and auditable scoring.
Comments: Accepted at 28th International Symposium on Symbolic and Numeric Algorithms for Scientific Computing (SYNASC 2026)
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.07540 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2608.07540v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.07540
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Fateme Mazdarani [view email]
[v1] Wed, 29 Jul 2026 23:02:46 UTC (1,020 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-08
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)