MetaSpace: Metamorphic Testing for Spatial Cognition in Embodied Agents
arXiv AIArchived Aug 11, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2608.07533v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: An embodied agent is an intelligent entity that interacts with its environment through a physical body. Currently, the evaluation of embodied agents primarily relies on two paradigms: (1) manually annotated Visual Question Answering (VQA) pairs and (2) high-level task completion metrics, such as success in navigation or manipulation. The former is labor-intensive and subject to variability in annotation quality. The latter may obscure critical vuln
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 26 Jul 2026]
MetaSpace: Metamorphic Testing for Spatial Cognition in Embodied Agents
Gengyang Xu, Dongwei Xiao, Yiteng Peng, Shuai Wang
An embodied agent is an intelligent entity that interacts with its environment through a physical body. Currently, the evaluation of embodied agents primarily relies on two paradigms: (1) manually annotated Visual Question Answering (VQA) pairs and (2) high-level task completion metrics, such as success in navigation or manipulation. The former is labor-intensive and subject to variability in annotation quality. The latter may obscure critical vulnerabilities, allowing agents to complete tasks through suboptimal means or safety violations, thereby concealing safety risks and inefficiencies. Given that spatial cognition is the cornerstone for executing embodied tasks, there is a pressing need to assess whether embodied agents possess robust spatial cognition during task execution.
Inspired by metamorphic testing principles in software engineering, we propose MetaSpace, a novel framework designed to evaluate the spatial cognition of agents. By leveraging spatiotemporal multimodal states derived from real execution trajectories, MetaSpace automatically generates test cases based on predefined metamorphic relations (MRs) grounded in logical rules and physical laws. Crucially, we encode these MRs as executable rules in a logic programming language (Prolog). Violations of these relations indicate failures in spatial cognition. Our empirical evaluation across three embodied scenarios demonstrates that MetaSpace successfully detects 90,422 spatial cognition errors in state-of-the-art (SOTA) MLLM-driven agents. We introduce the Spatial Cognition (SC) score to quantify performance. Results indicate that all SOTA agents achieve average scores between 0.44 and 0.52, significantly lower than the human benchmark of 0.96.
Comments: 30 pages, 17 figures. Published in Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages (OOPSLA1)
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Software Engineering (cs.SE)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.07533 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2608.07533v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.07533
Focus to learn more
Journal reference: Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages, 10, OOPSLA1 (April 2026), 343-372
Related DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1145/3798212
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Gengyang Xu [view email]
[v1] Sun, 26 Jul 2026 14:07:20 UTC (1,197 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-08
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.SE
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)