Dynamic Coalition Formation and Communication Pricing in Skill-Based Agentic AI Systems
arXiv AIArchived Aug 11, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2608.07532v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern agentic AI systems combine multiple large language model agents with heterogeneous skills, yet most architectures either fix communication in advance or allow full broadcast. Both can be inefficient because token cost, latency, redundancy, and error propagation increase with the number of active agents and communication links. We model agent selection and communication as a cooperative game with task-conditioned net utility $U(C\mid x)=V(C\m
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 24 Jul 2026]
Dynamic Coalition Formation and Communication Pricing in Skill-Based Agentic AI Systems
Mojtaba Eslami
Modern agentic AI systems combine multiple large language model agents with heterogeneous skills, yet most architectures either fix communication in advance or allow full broadcast. Both can be inefficient because token cost, latency, redundancy, and error propagation increase with the number of active agents and communication links. We model agent selection and communication as a cooperative game with task-conditioned net utility
U(C∣x)=V(C∣x)−
∑
i∈C
c
i
, separating coalition-level costs from agent activation costs. We propose a marginal-value activation rule and greedy router, extend the model to optimize communication edges with per-edge costs, and use estimated Shapley values to predict which agents are worth contacting before and during execution. We connect the problem to submodular maximization and prove two limited guarantees: a curvature-refined bound for a monotone, cardinality-constrained special case, and a tight
1/2
-approximation, with a correction for signed objectives, for an unconstrained non-monotone case via double greedy. Neither guarantee applies directly to the main router, which remains a heuristic. We also prove a Shapley-submodularity sandwich bound linking the error of marginal-value routing to a per-agent diminishing-returns quantity. In synthetic experiments, greedy routing achieves
99.5
of brute-force-optimal utility while activating
1.96
of
8
agents on average, compared with
38.8
for full broadcast. Performance is robust to activation cost and redundancy weight but falls to
66
under strong violations of submodularity or noisy value estimates. We distinguish the framework from Shapley pricing, hedonic coalition formation, and communication-graph pruning, and propose evaluation on real multi-agent LLM benchmarks.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Theoretical Economics (econ.TH)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.07532 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2608.07532v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.07532
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Mojtaba Eslami [view email]
[v1] Fri, 24 Jul 2026 19:25:21 UTC (27 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-08
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.LG
econ
econ.TH
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)