CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Aug 11, 2026

SkillsMetric: Mapping the Detection Boundary of Static Analysis for Malicious Agent Skills

arXiv Security Archived Aug 11, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2608.08468v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agent Skills---structured packages of instructions and scripts that augment LLM-based agents---are rapidly proliferating, yet their security properties remain under-explored. We present \textsc{SkillsMetric}, a five-stage static analysis framework that scores skill packages along pattern density, statistical anomaly, dataflow taint, import anomaly, and capability mismatch dimensions. We construct an adversarial evaluation dataset of 2{,}266 skills

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Cryptography and Security [Submitted on 9 Aug 2026] SkillsMetric: Mapping the Detection Boundary of Static Analysis for Malicious Agent Skills Xinze Chen, Chi Zhang, Ping Ji, Yimin Liu Agent Skills---structured packages of instructions and scripts that augment LLM-based agents---are rapidly proliferating, yet their security properties remain under-explored. We present \textsc{SkillsMetric}, a five-stage static analysis framework that scores skill packages along pattern density, statistical anomaly, dataflow taint, import anomaly, and capability mismatch dimensions. We construct an adversarial evaluation dataset of 2{,}266 skills spanning 16~attack types across code-level, system-level, and semantic-level threats, and evaluate on the full SkillMD-138K corpus. Our framework achieves an AUC of 0.93 and 5-fold cross-validated F1 of 73.4\% ± 0.5\%, with strong detection of data exfiltration (93\%) and steganographic payloads (93\%). Crucially, we identify fundamental blind spots: \emph{host destruction} attacks using common shell commands evade all five stages (0\% detection), and \emph{prompt injection} via natural-language manipulation achieves only 42\% detection. These findings establish that static analysis alone is insufficient for skill security, motivating defense-in-depth architectures that combine fast static pre-screening with semantic review. Comments: 6 pages, 3 figures, 3 tables Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2608.08468 [cs.CR]   (or arXiv:2608.08468v1 [cs.CR] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.08468 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Xinze Chen [view email] [v1] Sun, 9 Aug 2026 04:19:10 UTC (37 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.CR < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv Security
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Aug 11, 2026
    Archived
    Aug 11, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗