Defending Retrieval-Augmented Intrusion Detection Against Knowledge Poisoning and Prompt Injection
arXiv SecurityArchived Aug 11, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2608.08100v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enables large language models to classify network flows and generate human-readable incident reports by retrieving semantically similar historical traffic from a vector knowledge base. However, the retrieval layer introduces vulnerabilities to knowledge poisoning and prompt-injection attacks. We present RAG-IDS, a three-tier multi-agent intrusion detection framework with a retrieval-boundary defense combining so
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
[Submitted on 8 Aug 2026]
Defending Retrieval-Augmented Intrusion Detection Against Knowledge Poisoning and Prompt Injection
Kaysarul Anas Apurba, Md. Hasibul Hasan, Mahedee Zaman Moon, Sk. Md. Mizanur Rahman, Atsuo Inomata
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enables large language models to classify network flows and generate human-readable incident reports by retrieving semantically similar historical traffic from a vector knowledge base. However, the retrieval layer introduces vulnerabilities to knowledge poisoning and prompt-injection attacks. We present RAG-IDS, a three-tier multi-agent intrusion detection framework with a retrieval-boundary defense combining soft trust scoring, label-embedding consistency checking (LECC), and prompt sanitization, designed to recover classification quality under retrieval-layer attack. Experiments on CIC-UNSW-NB15 show recovery relative to clean undefended performance ranging from R=1.0 at 1% poisoning to R=0.57 at 30%, with negligible clean-performance overhead. Under prompt injection, multi-document retrieval limits label-flip success to 0.6-2.4%, compared with 35-55% for single-document retrieval. Ablation results show that LECC is the primary contributor to robustness, while soft trust-based demotion outperforms hard filtering. The defended RAG pipeline offers an explainable, attack-resilient foundation for intrusion detection, well suited for hybrid deployment alongside high-throughput classifiers.
Comments: 14 pages with Appnedix, 11 figures. Submitted to IEEE CIC 2026, Research Track (double-blind review)
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.08100 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2608.08100v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.08100
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Kaysarul Anas Apurba [view email]
[v1] Sat, 8 Aug 2026 12:29:47 UTC (777 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CR
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-08
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI
cs.LG
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)