Prune-then-Quantize or Quantize-then-Prune? Understanding the Impact of Compression Order in Joint Model Compression
arXiv AIArchived Mar 20, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2603.18426v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: What happens when multiple compression methods are combined-does the order in which they are applied matter? Joint model compression has emerged as a powerful strategy to achieve higher efficiency by combining multiple methods such as pruning and quantization. A central but underexplored factor in joint model compression is the compression order, or the sequence of different methods within the compression pipeline. Most prior studies have either si
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 19 Mar 2026]
Prune-then-Quantize or Quantize-then-Prune? Understanding the Impact of Compression Order in Joint Model Compression
Minjun Kim, Jaehyeon Choi, Hyunwoo Yang, Jongjin Kim, Jinho Song, U Kang
What happens when multiple compression methods are combined-does the order in which they are applied matter? Joint model compression has emerged as a powerful strategy to achieve higher efficiency by combining multiple methods such as pruning and quantization. A central but underexplored factor in joint model compression is the compression order, or the sequence of different methods within the compression pipeline. Most prior studies have either sidestepped the issue by assuming orthogonality between techniques, while a few have examined them only in highly constrained cases. Consequently, the broader role of compression order in shaping model performance remains poorly understood. In this paper, we address the overlooked problem of compression order and provide both theoretical and empirical analysis. We formulate the problem of optimizing the compression order and introduce the Progressive Intensity Hypothesis, which states that weaker perturbations should precede stronger ones. We provide theoretical guarantees showing that the relative benefit of one order increases with the underlying performance gap. Extensive experiments on both language and vision models validate the hypothesis, and further show its generality to broader setups such as multi-stage compression and mixed-precision quantization.
Comments: ICLR 2026
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.18426 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2603.18426v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.18426
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Minjun Kim [view email]
[v1] Thu, 19 Mar 2026 02:40:23 UTC (1,041 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-03
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)