FaithSteer-BENCH: A Deployment-Aligned Stress-Testing Benchmark for Inference-Time Steering
arXiv AIArchived Mar 20, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2603.18329v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Inference-time steering is widely regarded as a lightweight and parameter-free mechanism for controlling large language model (LLM) behavior, and prior work has often suggested that simple activation-level interventions can reliably induce targeted behavioral changes. However, such conclusions are typically drawn under relatively relaxed evaluation settings that overlook deployment constraints, capability trade-offs, and real-world robustness. We t
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 18 Mar 2026]
FaithSteer-BENCH: A Deployment-Aligned Stress-Testing Benchmark for Inference-Time Steering
Zikang Ding, Qiying Hu, Yi Zhang, Hongji Li, Junchi Yao, Hongbo Liu, Lijie Hu
Inference-time steering is widely regarded as a lightweight and parameter-free mechanism for controlling large language model (LLM) behavior, and prior work has often suggested that simple activation-level interventions can reliably induce targeted behavioral changes. However, such conclusions are typically drawn under relatively relaxed evaluation settings that overlook deployment constraints, capability trade-offs, and real-world robustness. We therefore introduce \textbf{FaithSteer-BENCH}, a stress-testing benchmark that evaluates steering methods at a fixed deployment-style operating point through three gate-wise criteria: controllability, utility preservation, and robustness. Across multiple models and representative steering approaches, we uncover several systematic failure modes that are largely obscured under standard evaluation, including illusory controllability, measurable cognitive tax on unrelated capabilities, and substantial brittleness under mild instruction-level perturbations, role prompts, encoding transformations, and data scarcity. Gate-wise benchmark results show that existing methods do not necessarily provide reliable controllability in deployment-oriented practical settings. In addition, mechanism-level diagnostics indicate that many steering methods induce prompt-conditional alignment rather than stable latent directional shifts, further explaining their fragility under stress. FaithSteer-BENCH therefore provides a unified benchmark and a clearer analytical lens for future method design, reliability evaluation, and deployment-oriented research in steering.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.18329 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2603.18329v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.18329
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Zikang Ding [view email]
[v1] Wed, 18 Mar 2026 22:28:36 UTC (10,918 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-03
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)