IB-RL: Isolated Bilateral Reinforcement Learning for Strategic Dialogue Agents
arXiv AIArchived Aug 10, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2608.06735v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) has achieved strong results in improving large language models (LLMs) on tasks with stationary, verifiable rewards, such as mathematical reasoning and code execution. In these settings, the environment follows fixed rules and does not adapt strategically to the agent. Strategic dialogue differs in this respect: the environment is another agent that adapts to the policy, and success depends on the interaction between the
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 7 Aug 2026]
IB-RL: Isolated Bilateral Reinforcement Learning for Strategic Dialogue Agents
Senhao Wang, Chenghao Cai, Haitao Hu, Mingxing Huang, Xingguang Wang, Wenhao Li, Zecheng Lin
Reinforcement learning (RL) has achieved strong results in improving large language models (LLMs) on tasks with stationary, verifiable rewards, such as mathematical reasoning and code execution. In these settings, the environment follows fixed rules and does not adapt strategically to the agent. Strategic dialogue differs in this respect: the environment is another agent that adapts to the policy, and success depends on the interaction between the two sides. Despite this interactive nature, current RL approaches typically train a target agent against a fixed counterpart or simulator. We find that this training paradigm encourages the policy to exploit counterpart-specific regularities rather than learn strategies that generalize across counterparts. We call this problem the static-counterpart mismatch, which we quantify directly in our experiments. To address it, we propose Isolated Bilateral Reinforcement Learning (IB-RL), in which the two roles coevolve through joint rollouts while each role optimizes its own reward through fully independent advantages, action masks, and update paths. We evaluate frozen policies against fully independent held-out counterparts in both domains. On Vehicle TeleSales, IB-RL achieves 89.6% Success@1, compared to 84.6% for the best unilateral RL baseline. On Deal-or-NoDeal, it reaches 98.4% agreement against DeepSeek V4 Pro, compared to 86.4% for the best unilateral baseline. These results indicate that jointly training both roles with strict peragent isolation produces policies that generalize more effectively to unseen counterparts.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.06735 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2608.06735v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.06735
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Chenghao Cai [view email]
[v1] Fri, 7 Aug 2026 02:59:53 UTC (2,407 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-08
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CL
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)