CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Mar 20, 2026

DEAF: A Benchmark for Diagnostic Evaluation of Acoustic Faithfulness in Audio Language Models

arXiv AI Archived Mar 20, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2603.18048v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent Audio Multimodal Large Language Models (Audio MLLMs) demonstrate impressive performance on speech benchmarks, yet it remains unclear whether these models genuinely process acoustic signals or rely on text-based semantic inference. To systematically study this question, we introduce DEAF (Diagnostic Evaluation of Acoustic Faithfulness), a benchmark of over 2,700 conflict stimuli spanning three acoustic dimensions: emotional prosody, backgroun

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 17 Mar 2026] DEAF: A Benchmark for Diagnostic Evaluation of Acoustic Faithfulness in Audio Language Models Jiaqi Xiong, Yunjia Qi, Qi Cao, Yu Zheng, Weisheng Xu, Ziteng Wang, Ruofan Liao, Yutong Zhang, Sichen Liu Recent Audio Multimodal Large Language Models (Audio MLLMs) demonstrate impressive performance on speech benchmarks, yet it remains unclear whether these models genuinely process acoustic signals or rely on text-based semantic inference. To systematically study this question, we introduce DEAF (Diagnostic Evaluation of Acoustic Faithfulness), a benchmark of over 2,700 conflict stimuli spanning three acoustic dimensions: emotional prosody, background sounds, and speaker identity. Then, we design a controlled multi-level evaluation framework that progressively increases textual influence, ranging from semantic conflicts in the content to misleading prompts and their combination, allowing us to disentangle content-driven bias from prompt-induced sycophancy. We further introduce diagnostic metrics to quantify model reliance on textual cues over acoustic signals. Our evaluation of seven Audio MLLMs reveals a consistent pattern of text dominance: models are sensitive to acoustic variations, yet predictions are predominantly driven by textual inputs, revealing a gap between high performance on standard speech benchmarks and genuine acoustic understanding. Comments: 14 pages,6 figures Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Sound (cs.SD); Audio and Speech Processing (eess.AS) Cite as: arXiv:2603.18048 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2603.18048v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.18048 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Jiaqi Xiong [view email] [v1] Tue, 17 Mar 2026 15:52:26 UTC (12,711 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-03 Change to browse by: cs cs.SD eess eess.AS References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Mar 20, 2026
    Archived
    Mar 20, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗