Beyond Routing Weights: Faithful Response-Level Interpretation of Mixture-of-Experts Reward Models via Contribution Contrast
arXiv AIArchived Aug 10, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2608.06400v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reward models are central to learning from human preferences, yet identifying what drives their predictions remains challenging. Recent sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) reward models seek to improve interpretability by routing prompts to specialized experts and characterizing experts through examples with high routing weights. However, routing weights only reveal which prompts an expert $\textit{receives}$, not how it $\textit{judges}$ responses, pr
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 31 Jul 2026]
Beyond Routing Weights: Faithful Response-Level Interpretation of Mixture-of-Experts Reward Models via Contribution Contrast
Yifan Wang, Jinyi Mu, Mayank Jobanputra, Yu Wang, Soyoung Oh, Isabel Valera, Vera Demberg
Reward models are central to learning from human preferences, yet identifying what drives their predictions remains challenging. Recent sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) reward models seek to improve interpretability by routing prompts to specialized experts and characterizing experts through examples with high routing weights. However, routing weights only reveal which prompts an expert
receives
, not how it
judges
responses, providing only a partial account of expert behavior. We therefore propose
Co
ntribution-
Co
ntrast (
CoCo
) response-level interpretation, which faithfully characterizes experts' roles using chosen-rejected response pairs with the largest contribution contrasts, jointly capturing routing and preference behavior. Across automatic and human evaluations, CoCo yields more coherent, faithful, and specialized interpretations than router-based, score-based, and sparse autoencoder-based alternatives while maintaining competitive reward modeling accuracy. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic study of interpretation methods for MoE reward models.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.06400 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2608.06400v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.06400
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Yifan Wang [view email]
[v1] Fri, 31 Jul 2026 17:43:30 UTC (66 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-08
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)